The efficacy of muscle energy techniques in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects: a systematic review

被引:38
作者
Thomas, Ewan [1 ,2 ]
Cavallaro, Antonio Rosario [2 ]
Mani, Diba [3 ,4 ]
Bianco, Antonino [1 ]
Palma, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Sport & Exercise Sci Res Unit, Via Giovanni Pascoli 6, I-90144 Palermo, Italy
[2] AISeRCO, Int Acad Osteopath Med, Palermo, Italy
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Integrat Physiol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Appl Physiol & Kinesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Manipulative therapies; Pain; Range of motion; LOW-BACK-PAIN; UPPER TRAPEZIUS; MANUAL THERAPY; TRIGGER POINTS; CERVICAL-SPINE; NECK PAIN; RANGE; MOTION; MANIPULATION; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-019-0258-7
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Muscle energy techniques are applied to reduce pain and increase range of motion. These are applied to a variety of pathological conditions and on asymptomatic subjects. There is however limited knowledge on their effectiveness and which protocol may be the most beneficial. Objective: The aim of this review is to determine the efficacy of muscle energy techniques (MET) in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Design: Systematic Review. Methods: A literature search was performed using the following database: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, NLM Pubmed and ScienceDirect. Studies regarding MET in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were considered for investigation. The main outcomes took into account range of motion, chronic and acute pain and trigger points. Two trained investigators independently screened eligible studies according to the eligibility criteria, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Randomized control trials (RCT's) were analyzed for quality using the PEDro scale. Results: A total of 26 studies were considered eligible and included in the quantitative synthesis: 14 regarding symptomatic patients and 12 regarding asymptomatic subjects. Quality assessment of the studies through the PEDro scale observed a "moderate to high" quality of the included records. Conclusions: MET are an effective treatment for reducing chronic and acute pain of the lower back. MET are also effective in treating chronic neck pain and chronic lateral epicondylitis. MET can be applied to increase range of motion of a joint when a functional limitation is present. Other techniques seem to be more appropriate compared to MET for trigger points.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INDIAN J PHYSIOTHER, DOI DOI 10.5958/0973-5674.2014.00009.4
[2]  
[Anonymous], J MAN MANIP THER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, HUMAN BIOL REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT J LATEST RES SCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], INDIAN J PHYSIOTHER
[6]  
Ballantyne F., 2003, J OSTEOPATH MED, V6, P59, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1443-8461(03)80015-1
[7]  
Burns DK, 2006, J AM OSTEOPATH ASSOC, V106, P137
[8]  
CASSIDY JD, 1992, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V15, P570
[9]  
Chaitow L., 2001, Muscle Energy Techniques
[10]  
CRONE C, 1993, DAN MED BULL, V40, P571