Effect of Adding Neural Mobilization Versus Myofascial Release to Stabilization Exercises after Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:13
作者
Elsayyad, Mohsen Mohamed [1 ]
Abdel-Aal, Nabil Mahmoud [1 ]
Helal, Mohamed Elsayed [2 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Phys Therapy, Dept Phys Therapy Basic Sci, Giza, Egypt
[2] Sadat Gen Hosp, Dept Phys Therapy, Monofia, Egypt
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2021年 / 102卷 / 02期
关键词
Pain; Range of motion; Articular; Rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2020.07.009
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To test the effect of adding neural mobilization (NM) versus myofascial release (MFR) to stabilization exercises (SE) on disability, pain, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) in patients with lumbar spine fusion (LSF). Design: A single blinded, parallel groups, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient public and governmental hospital clinics. Participants: Patients (NZ60) who had undergone LSF were randomly assigned into 3 equal groups. Intervention: Group I received NM plus SE, group II received MFR and SE, and group III received SE only. Each group visited the hospital 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale, and back range of motion (BROM) were assessed before starting treatment, immediately after finishing treatment, and 1 month later. Results: There were statistically significant differences among the groups regarding the ODI and pain (P>.05) in favor of the study groups, but no statistically significant differences were found among groups regarding the BROM outcome (P>.05). Regarding the within-group effect, statistically significant differences were found in all outcomes after 1 month of treatment, as well as after 1 month of follow-up in each group (P<.05). Conclusions: Patients who received NM or MFR combined with SE demonstrated better improvement, in favor of the NM group, regarding disability and pain than patients who received SE alone after LSF. No differences were found among the groups regarding lumbar ROM. (C) 2020 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 260
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Effectiveness of Myofascial release in the management of chronic low back pain in nursing professionals [J].
Ajimsha, M. S. ;
Daniel, Binsu ;
Chithra, S. .
JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2014, 18 (02) :273-281
[2]  
Ali M, 2015, RAWAL MED J, V40, P41
[3]  
[Anonymous], SPINE
[4]   Effects of Myofascial Release in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Arguisuelas, Maria D. ;
Francisco Lison, Juan ;
Sanchez-Zuriaga, Daniel ;
Martinez-Hurtado, Isabel ;
Domenech-Fernandez, Julio .
SPINE, 2017, 42 (09) :627-634
[5]   Pain management following spinal surgeries: An appraisal of the available options [J].
Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Singh ;
Haldar, Rudrashish .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2015, 6 (03) :105-110
[6]  
Balasubramaniam A., 2014, Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, V6, P75, DOI DOI 10.4103/1947-489X.210367
[7]   The Effectiveness of Neural Mobilization for Neuromusculoskeletal Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Basson, Annalie ;
Olivier, Benita ;
Ellis, Richard ;
Coppieters, Michel ;
Stewart, Aimee ;
Mudzi, Witness .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 47 (09) :593-615
[8]   Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain [J].
Boonstra, Anne M. ;
Schiphorst Preuper, Henrica R. ;
Reneman, Michiel F. ;
Posthumus, Jitze B. ;
Stewart, Roy E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2008, 31 (02) :165-169
[9]   Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain [J].
Brox, Jens Ivar ;
Nygaard, Oystein P. ;
Holm, Inger ;
Keller, Anne ;
Ingebrigtsen, Tor ;
Reikeras, Olav .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2010, 69 (09) :1643-1648
[10]  
Buker N, J BACK MUSCULOSKELET