Transitional Restricted Linkage Between Emissions Trading Schemes

被引:10
作者
Quemin, Simon [1 ]
de Perthuis, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Grantham Res Inst, London, England
[2] PSL Res Univ, Paris Dauphine Univ, Climate Econ Chair, Paris, France
关键词
Climate change policy; Emissions trading; Linkage; Restrictions on permit trading; CAP-AND-TRADE; CLIMATE POLICY; POLLUTION PERMITS; CARBON MARKETS; FLEXIBILITY; EFFICIENCY; CEILINGS; PRICES; CHINA; CDM;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-018-00307-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Linkages between Emissions Trading Systems are deemed an important element of the future climate policy landscape. They are, however, difficult to agree and remain few and far between. Temporary restrictions on permit trading have potential to facilitate and gradually approach unrestricted, full linkage. We compare the relative merits of several link restrictions in this respect, namely quantitative transfer limits, border taxes on transfers, exchange and discount rates, and unilateral linkage. To this end, we develop a simple model to have a unifying framework which, in conjunction with lessons we draw from real-world experiences, serves as a basis for a broader, policy-oriented discussion. While quantitative restrictions seem to be the natural route to full linkage, they can lead to uncertain distributional effects and weaken price signals. These aspects are mitigated under a border permit tax, but this policy seems harder to implement. Exchange rates have potential to adjust for programmes' stringencies and raise ambition over time, but can be challenging to select. As experience corroborates, unilateral linkage can be a convenient approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:32
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Anticipated international environmental agreements [J].
Acikgoz, Omer T. ;
Benchekroun, Hassan .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 92 :306-336
[2]   Comparing emissions mitigation efforts across countries [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. ;
Pizer, William A. ;
Akimoto, Keigo .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2017, 17 (04) :501-515
[3]   Alternative Metrics for Comparing Domestic Climate Change Mitigation Efforts and the Emerging International Climate Policy Architecture [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. ;
Pizer, William A. .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2016, 10 (01) :3-24
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TRENDS PROJ EU ETS 2
[5]  
[Anonymous], EC ENERGY ENV POLICY
[6]  
Bernstein PM, 1999, ENERG J, P221
[7]   Facilitating linkage of climate policies through the Paris outcome [J].
Bodansky, Daniel M. ;
Hoedl, Seth A. ;
Metcalf, Gilbert E. ;
Stavins, Robert N. .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 (08) :956-972
[8]  
Bollen J, 1999, ENERG J, P177
[9]  
Braun N, 2015, CESIFO SEMINAR SER, P239
[10]  
Burtraw D, 2017, 1716 RES FUT