Comparison of contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in healthy and cancerous breast tissue

被引:14
作者
Cho, Gene Young [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Moy, Linda [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kim, Sungheon G. [1 ,3 ]
Leite, Ana Paula Klautau [5 ]
Baete, Steven H. [1 ,3 ]
Babb, James S. [1 ,3 ]
Sodickson, Daniel K. [1 ,3 ]
Sigmund, Eric E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Bernard & Irene Schwartz Ctr Biomed Imaging, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Sackler Inst Grad Biomed Sci, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Ctr Adv Imaging Innovat & Res CAI2R, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Inst Canc, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Breast MR; Dynamic contrast enhancement; Background parenchymal enhancement; 3; Tesla; Diffusion weighted imaging; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; MR MAMMOGRAPHY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To measure background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and compare with other contrast enhancement values and diffusion-weighted MRI parameters in healthy and cancerous breast tissue at the clinical level. Materials and methods: This HIPAA-compliant, IRB approved retrospective study enrolled 77 patients (38 patients with breast cancer - mean age 51.8 +/- 10.0 years; 39 high-risk patients for screening evaluation - mean age 46.3 +/- 11.7 years), who underwent contrast-enhanced 3T breast MRI. Contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging were performed to quantify BPE, lesion contrast enhancement, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics in fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and lesions. Results: BPE did not correlate with ADC values. Mean BPE for the lesion-bearing patients was higher (43.9%) compared to that of the high-risk screening patients (28.3%, p = 0.004). Significant correlation (r = 0.37, p < 0.05) was found between BPE and lesion contrast enhancement. Conclusion: No significant association was observed between parenchymal or lesion enhancement with conventional apparent diffusion metrics, suggesting that proliferative processes are not co-regulated in cancerous and parenchymal tissue. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1888 / 1893
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Kinetic Properties of Background Parenchymal Enhancement throughout the Phases of the Menstrual Cycle
    Amarosa, Alana R.
    McKellop, Jason
    Leite, Ana Paula Klautau
    Moccaldi, Melanie
    Clendenen, Tess V.
    Babb, James S.
    Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne
    Moy, Linda
    Kim, Sungheon
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (02) : 356 - 365
  • [2] [Anonymous], INVESTIGATIVE RADIOL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
  • [4] [Anonymous], J MAGN RESON IMAGING
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques
    Baltzer, P. A. T.
    Renz, D. M.
    Herrmann, K. -H.
    Dietzel, M.
    Krumbein, I.
    Gajda, M.
    Camara, O.
    Reichenbach, J. R.
    Kaiser, W. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (07) : 1612 - 1620
  • [6] Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient
    Baron, Paul
    Dorrius, Monique D.
    Kappert, Peter
    Oudkerk, Matthijs
    Sijens, Paul E.
    [J]. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2010, 23 (04) : 399 - 405
  • [7] Diffusion-weighted MR for Differentiation of Breast Lesions at 3.0 T: How Does Selection of Diffusion Protocols Affect Diagnosis?
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Gruber, Stephan
    Pinker, Katja
    Grabner, Guenther
    Stadlbauer, Andreas
    Weber, Michael
    Moser, Ewald
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (02) : 341 - 351
  • [8] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MRI at 3.0 T Differentiates Malignant Breast Lesions From Benign Lesions and Breast Parenchyma
    Bokacheva, Louisa
    Kaplan, Jennifer B.
    Giri, Dilip D.
    Patil, Sujata
    Gnanasigamani, Merlin
    Nyman, C. Gregory
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Thakur, Sunitha B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 40 (04) : 813 - 823
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of hormone-induced breast changes in young premenopausal women
    Clendenen, Tess V.
    Kim, Sungheon
    Moy, Linda
    Wan, Livia
    Rusinek, Henry
    Stanczyk, Frank Z.
    Pike, Malcolm C.
    Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Anne
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [10] Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI: Impact on Diagnostic Performance
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Liu, Franklin
    Peacock, Sue
    Eby, Peter R.
    Gutierrez, Robert L.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (04) : W373 - W380