A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures

被引:60
|
作者
Rousseau, Julie-Anne [1 ]
Girard, Karine [1 ]
Turcot-Lemay, Lucile [1 ]
Thomas, Nancy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
cesarean; pain; skin closure; staples; subcuticular sutures;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare postoperative pain according to the skin closure method (subcuticular sutures vs staples) after an elective term cesarean section. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of 101 women was performed. Women were randomly assigned to subcuticular sutures or staples. Operative technique and postoperative analgesia were standardized. Stratification was used for primary vs repeat cesareans. Analog pain and satisfaction scales ranging from 0-10 were completed at postoperative days 1 and 3, and at 6 weeks postoperatively. A digital photograph of the incision was taken at 6 weeks postoperatively and evaluated by 3 independent blinded observers. RESULTS: Pain at 6 weeks postoperatively was significantly less in the staple group (0.17 vs 0.51; P = .04). Operative time was shorter in that group (24.6 vs 32.9 minutes; P < .0001). No difference was noted for incision appearance and women's satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Staples are the method of choice for skin closure for elective term cesareans in our population.
引用
收藏
页码:265.e1 / 265.e4
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARING SKIN STAPLES TO SUTURES IN AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    SHUSTER, M
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1989, 35 : 505 - 509
  • [32] Incidence of Wound Complications in Cesarean Deliveries Following Closure with Absorbable Subcuticular Staples versus Conventional Skin Closure Techniques.
    Ruiz, Maria P.
    Schrufer-Poland, Tabitha L.
    Algren, Stacey
    Yeast, John D.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2016, 23 : 195A - 195A
  • [33] Skin closure after laparotomy with staples or sutures: a study of the mature scar
    Simcock, Jeremy W.
    Armitage, Jon
    Dixon, Liane
    MacFarlane, Kim
    Robertson, Greg M.
    Frizelle, Frank A.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 84 (09) : 656 - 659
  • [34] Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nuthalapaty, Francis S.
    Kuper, Spencer G.
    Higdon, H. Lee, III
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (01): : 166 - 167
  • [35] Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Rampersad, Roxane M.
    Carbone, Jeanine F.
    Stamilio, David
    Macones, George A.
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03): : 682 - 690
  • [36] A randomized controlled trial comparing skin closure in obese gynecologic patients: Staples vs monofilament suture
    Kuroki, L. M.
    Mullen, M. M.
    Massad, L. S.
    Wu, N.
    Liu, J.
    Powell, M. A.
    Mutch, D. G.
    Hagemann, A. R.
    Thaker, P. H.
    McCourt, C. K.
    Novetsky, A. P.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 145 : 54 - 55
  • [37] Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Dan
    Feng, Limin
    Xu, Lanzhi
    Li, Chunxia
    Zhang, Qi
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (08)
  • [38] Surgical Staples Compared With Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial (vol 121, pg 33, 2013)
    Figueroa, D.
    Jauk, V. C.
    Szychowski, J. M.
    Garner, R.
    Biggio, J. R.
    Andrews, W. W.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (05): : 1113 - 1113
  • [39] CLOSURE OF LAPAROTOMY WOUNDS - SKIN STAPLES VERSUS SUTURES
    RANABOLDO, CJ
    ROWEJONES, DC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (11) : 1172 - 1173
  • [40] Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial
    Sharma, Chanderdeep
    Sharma, Shikha
    Soni, Anjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (02)