Risks to the fetus from diagnostic imaging during pregnancy: review and proposal of a clinical protocol

被引:26
作者
Gomes, Mafalda [1 ]
Matias, Alexandra [1 ]
Macedo, Filipe [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Med, P-4099002 Oporto, Portugal
[2] SMIC, Oporto, Portugal
关键词
Diagnostic imaging; Fetal risks; Fetus; Pregnancy; Radiation; SUSPECTED PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; ACR GUIDANCE DOCUMENT; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; THERAPEUTIC ERCP; ABDOMINAL-TRAUMA; DOSE ESTIMATION; PART;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-015-3403-z
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Every day, medical practitioners face the dilemma of exposing pregnant or possibly pregnant patients to radiation from diagnostic examinations. Both doctors and patients often have questions about the risks of radiation. The most vulnerable period is between the 8th and 15th weeks of gestation. Deterministic effects like pregnancy loss, congenital malformations, growth retardation and neurobehavioral abnormalities have threshold doses above 100-200 mGy. The risk is considered negligible at 50 mGy and in reality no diagnostic examination exceeds this limit. The risk of carcinogenesis is slightly higher than in the general population. Intravenous iodinated contrast is discouraged, except in highly selected patients. Considering all the possible noxious effects of radiation exposure, measures to diminish radiation are essential and affect the fetal outcome. Nonionizing procedures should be considered whenever possible and every radiology center should have its own data analysis on fetal radiation exposure. In this review, we analyze existing literature on fetal risks due to radiation exposure, producing a clinical protocol to guide safe radiation use in a clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1916 / 1929
页数:14
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [91] Toppenberg KS, 1999, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V59, P1813
  • [92] Quality Initiatives Guidelines for Use of Medical Imaging during Pregnancy and Lactation
    Tremblay, Emilie
    Therasse, Eric
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Trop, Isabelle
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2012, 32 (03) : 897 - 911
  • [93] Tutty L., 2001, Radiography, V7, P227
  • [94] Plain film radiography, pregnancy, and therapeutic abortion revisited
    Ursprung, WM
    Howe, JW
    Yochum, TR
    Kettner, NW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 29 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [95] Imaging the pregnant patient with abdominal pain
    Wallace, Graham W.
    Davis, Melissa A.
    Semelka, Richard C.
    Fielding, Julia R.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2012, 37 (05): : 849 - 860
  • [96] Imaging of Pregnant and Lactating Patients: Part 1, Evidence-Based Review and Recommendations
    Wang, Page I.
    Chong, Suzanne T.
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Kelly, Aine M.
    Knoepp, Ursula D.
    Mazza, Michael B.
    Goodsitt, Mitchell M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (04) : 778 - 784
  • [97] Which study when? Is gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging safer than iodine-enhanced CT?
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [98] Whitt Carolyn Kiser, 2010, Radiol Technol, V81, P387
  • [99] Imaging in Pregnant Patients: Examination Appropriateness
    Wieseler, Karen M.
    Bhargava, Puneet
    Kanal, Kalpana M.
    Vaidya, Sandeep
    Stewart, Brent K.
    Dighe, Manjiri K.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (05) : 1215 - 1229
  • [100] Williams PM, 2010, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V82, P488