Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy

被引:394
作者
Kupelian, Patrick
Willoughby, Twyla
Mahadevan, Arul
Djemil, Toufik
Weinstein, Geoffrey
Jani, Shirish
Enke, Charles
Solberg, Timothy
Flores, Nicholas
Liu, David
Beyer, David
Levine, Lisa
机构
[1] MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Orlando, FL 32806 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Sharp Mem Hosp & Rehabil Ctr, San Diego, CA 90034 USA
[4] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Scottsdale Healthcare Arizona Oncol Serv, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[6] Calypso Med Technol Inc, Seattle, WA USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 67卷 / 04期
关键词
prostate; radiation; localization; tracking; motion;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.026
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report the clinical experience with an electromagnetic treatment target positioning and continuous monitoring system in patients with localized prostate cancer receiving external beam radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The Calypso System is a target positioning device that continuously monitors the location of three implanted electromagnetic transponders at a rate of 10 Hz. The system was used at five centers to position 41 patients over a full course of therapy. Electromagnetic positioning was compared to setup using skin marks and to stereoscopic X-ray localization of the transponders. Continuous monitoring was performed in 35 patients. Results: The difference between skin mark vs. the Calypso System alignment was found to be > 5 mm in vector length in more than 75% of fractions. Comparisons between the Calypso System and X-ray localization showed good agreement. Qualitatively, the continuous motion was unpredictable and varied from persistent drift to transient rapid movements. Displacements >= 3 and >= 5 mm for cumulative durations of at least 30 s were observed during 41% and 15% of sessions. In individual patients, the number of fractions with displacements >= 3 mm ranged from 3% to 87%; whereas the number of fractions with displacements >= 5 mm ranged from 0% to 56%. Conclusion: The Calypso System is a clinically efficient and objective localization method for positioning prostate patients undergoing radiotherapy. Initial treatment setup can be performed rapidly, accurately, and objectively before radiation delivery. The extent and frequency of prostate motion during radiotherapy delivery can be easily monitored and used for motion management. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1098
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Measurements of intrafraction motion and interfraction and intrafraction rotation of prostate by three-dimensional analysis of daily portal imaging with radiopaque markers [J].
Aubry, JF ;
Beaulieu, L ;
Girouard, LM ;
Aubin, S ;
Tremblay, D ;
Laverdière, J ;
Vigneault, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01) :30-39
[2]  
Balter JM, 2004, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V60, pS612
[3]   Accuracy of a wireless localization system for radiotherapy [J].
Balter, JM ;
Wright, JN ;
Newell, LJ ;
Friemel, B ;
Dimmer, S ;
Cheng, Y ;
Wong, J ;
Vertatschitsch, E ;
Mate, TP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :933-937
[4]   Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: Technical feasibility [J].
Balter, JM ;
Lam, KL ;
Sandler, HM ;
Littles, JF ;
Bree, RL ;
TenHaken, RK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05) :1281-1286
[5]  
Britton Keith R, 2005, Radiat Med, V23, P14
[6]   Pereneural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins [J].
Cannon, GM ;
Pound, CR ;
Landsittel, DP ;
Bastacky, SI ;
Dhir, R ;
Becich, MJ ;
Nelson, JB .
PROSTATE, 2005, 63 (04) :336-340
[7]   A practical method to achieve prostate gland immobilization and target verification for daily treatment [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Manola, J ;
Loffredo, M ;
Lopes, L ;
Nissen, K ;
O'Farrell, DA ;
Gordon, L ;
Tempany, CM ;
Cormack, RA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (05) :1431-1436
[8]   A comparison of ventilatory prostate movement in four treatment positions [J].
Dawson, LA ;
Litzenberg, DW ;
Brock, KK ;
Sanda, M ;
Sullivan, M ;
Sandler, HM ;
Balter, JM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (02) :319-323
[9]   Application of the no action level (NAL) protocol to correct for prostate motion based on electronic portal imaging of implanted markers [J].
De Boer, HCJ ;
Van Os, MJH ;
Jansen, PP ;
Heumen, BJM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04) :969-983
[10]   Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) [J].
Ghilezan, MJ ;
Jaffray, DA ;
Siewerdsen, JH ;
van Herk, M ;
Shetty, A ;
Sharpe, MB ;
Jafri, SZ ;
Vicini, FA ;
Matter, RC ;
Brabbins, DS ;
Martinez, AA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (02) :406-417