A randomized, double-blind comparison of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis

被引:62
|
作者
Wilcox, CM
Darouiche, RO
Laine, L
Moskovitz, BL
Mallegol, I
Wu, J
机构
[1] BAYLOR COLL MED, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[2] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[3] UNIV SO CALIF, SCH MED, LOS ANGELES, CA USA
[4] JANSSEN RES FDN, TITUSVILLE, NJ USA
来源
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 1997年 / 176卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1086/514028
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of itraconazole oral solution and fluconazole tablets in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. One hundred twenty-six immunocompromised patients with esophageal candidiasis were treated with itraconazole oral solution or fluconazole tablets (both at 100-200 mg) once daily for 3-8 weeks, for 2 weeks beyond the resolution of symptoms, and were then followed for 4 more weeks. Severity of symptoms was assessed weekly during treatment and every 2 weeks during follow-up. Patients treated with itraconazole oral solution had a rate of clinical response (cured or improved) comparable to that of patients treated with fluconazole (94% vs, 91%). The mycologic eradication rate was 92% for itraconazole and 78% for fluconazole. Both treatments were well tolerated. Results from treatment with once-daily itraconazole oral solution was clinically comparable to those with fluconazole and is an alternative for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条