Strength Is Still a Weakness in Coalition Formation: Replicating and Understanding the Strength-Is-Weakness Effect

被引:5
作者
Wissink, Joeri [1 ]
van Beest, Ilja [1 ]
Pronk, Tila [1 ]
van de Ven, Niels [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
coalition formation; Strength-is-Weakness; replication; equity; online synchronous games; POWER; ALTERNATIVES; EQUITY; NEGOTIATION; EXPERIENCE; RESOURCES; FAIRNESS; BEHAVIOR; PAYOFF;
D O I
10.1177/01461672211005883
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A key observation in coalition formation is that bargainers with most resources are often excluded from coalitions: the Strength-is-Weakness effect. Previous studies have suffered from low sample sizes and lack of (appropriate) incentives and have rarely focused on underlying processes. To address these issues, we conducted a cross-platform replication using the Online Coalition Game. We replicated the Strength-is-Weakness effect in a psychology laboratory, on Amazon Mechanical Turk, and on Prolific. Moreover, our results showed that the equity norm shapes the Strength-is-Weakness effect in two ways. First, strong bargainers claim a higher larger of the payoffs than weak bargainers do, making them less attractive coalition partners. Second, weak bargainers expect strong bargainers to make these larger claims, directing weak bargainers to each other from the outset. Finally, the studies suggest that the Online Coalition Game is a viable tool for conducting high-powered coalition formation research.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 296
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science [J].
Aarts, Alexander A. ;
Anderson, Joanna E. ;
Anderson, Christopher J. ;
Attridge, Peter R. ;
Attwood, Angela ;
Axt, Jordan ;
Babel, Molly ;
Bahnik, Stepan ;
Baranski, Erica ;
Barnett-Cowan, Michael ;
Bartmess, Elizabeth ;
Beer, Jennifer ;
Bell, Raoul ;
Bentley, Heather ;
Beyan, Leah ;
Binion, Grace ;
Borsboom, Denny ;
Bosch, Annick ;
Bosco, Frank A. ;
Bowman, Sara D. ;
Brandt, Mark J. ;
Braswell, Erin ;
Brohmer, Hilmar ;
Brown, Benjamin T. ;
Brown, Kristina ;
Bruening, Jovita ;
Calhoun-Sauls, Ann ;
Callahan, Shannon P. ;
Chagnon, Elizabeth ;
Chandler, Jesse ;
Chartier, Christopher R. ;
Cheung, Felix ;
Christopherson, Cody D. ;
Cillessen, Linda ;
Clay, Russ ;
Cleary, Hayley ;
Cloud, Mark D. ;
Cohn, Michael ;
Cohoon, Johanna ;
Columbus, Simon ;
Cordes, Andreas ;
Costantini, Giulio ;
Alvarez, Leslie D. Cramblet ;
Cremata, Ed ;
Crusius, Jan ;
DeCoster, Jamie ;
DeGaetano, Michelle A. ;
Della Penna, Nicolas ;
den Bezemer, Bobby ;
Deserno, Marie K. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6251)
[2]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[3]   Conducting interactive experiments online [J].
Arechar, Antonio A. ;
Gaechter, Simon ;
Molleman, Lucas .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (01) :99-131
[4]   A two-stage analysis of the role of formateurs in parliamentary government formation [J].
Baeck, Hanna ;
Dumont, Patrick .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2008, 135 (3-4) :353-373
[5]   The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Hogarth, RM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :7-42
[6]   A THEORY OF COALITIONS IN THE TRIAD [J].
CAPLOW, T .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1956, 21 (04) :489-493
[7]   The pluralism of fairness ideals: An experimental approach [J].
Cappelen, Alexander W. ;
Hole, Astri Drange ;
Sorensen, Erik O. ;
Tungodden, Bertil .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (03) :818-827
[8]   Nonnaivete among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers [J].
Chandler, Jesse ;
Mueller, Pam ;
Paolacci, Gabriele .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (01) :112-130
[9]   ACHIEVEMENT AND NURTURANCE IN TRIADS VARYING IN POWER DISTRIBUTION [J].
CHANEY, MV ;
VINACKE, WE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 60 (02) :175-181
[10]   oTree-An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments [J].
Chen, Daniel L. ;
Schonger, Martin ;
Wickens, Chris .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2016, 9 :88-97