Corporate governance pillars and business sustainability: does stakeholder engagement matter?

被引:10
作者
Konadu, Renata [1 ]
Ahinful, Gabriel Sam [2 ]
Owusu-Agyei, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] De Montfort Univ, Leicester Castle Business Sch, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England
[2] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
Corporate governance; Board functions; Board structure; Stakeholder engagement; Business sustainability; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; BOARD INDEPENDENCE; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; FIRM; SPECIFICATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1057/s41310-021-00115-3
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study extends the existing work on corporate governance and business sustainability by exploring corporate governance pillars comprising board functions, structure, strategy, compensation and shareholder rights utilizing data from listed S&P 500 firms. Using panel fixed effects and two-step GMM, we discovered that environmental, social and financial sustainability dimensions of the business sustainability are impacted positively by board functions and board structure. Our findings further reveal that low stakeholder engagement adversely impacts companies' bottom-line performance. The results are robust to outliers, model specifications, statistical estimations and alternative measures of performance. Most importantly, the inferences from the moderating result suggest stakeholder engagement as a strategic approach to improve performance. The study is relevant for business sustainability practitioners and policy makers in advancing principles of corporate governance to promote enhanced performance.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 289
页数:21
相关论文
共 131 条
[121]   The Relevance of Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital Theory in the Context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian Perspective [J].
Sen, Suman ;
Cowley, James .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 118 (02) :413-427
[122]   Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance [J].
Shaukat, Amama ;
Qiu, Yan ;
Trojanowski, Grzegorz .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 135 (03) :569-585
[123]   A survey of corporate governance [J].
Shleifer, A ;
Vishny, RW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (02) :737-783
[124]   The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility [J].
Spitzeck, Heiko .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2009, 9 (04) :495-+
[125]   Does Corporate Philanthropy Increase Firm Value? The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance [J].
Su, Weichieh ;
Sauerwald, Steve .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2018, 57 (04) :599-635
[126]   Shareholder proposals in the new millennium: Shareholder support, board response, and market reaction [J].
Thomas, Randall S. ;
Cotter, James F. .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2007, 13 (2-3) :368-391
[127]   Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data [J].
Ullah, Subhan ;
Akhtar, Pervaiz ;
Zaefarian, Ghasem .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 :69-78
[128]   Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link? [J].
Walls, Judith L. ;
Berrone, Pascual ;
Phan, Phillip H. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (08) :885-913
[129]   Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy [J].
Williams, RJ .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2003, 42 (01) :1-10
[130]   ALTERNATIVE TESTS OF INDEPENDENCE BETWEEN STOCHASTIC REGRESSORS AND DISTURBANCES [J].
WU, DM .
ECONOMETRICA, 1973, 41 (04) :733-750