Distinguishing Response Conflict and Task Conflict in the Stroop Task: Evidence From Ex-Gaussian Distribution Analysis

被引:126
作者
Steinhauser, Marco [1 ]
Huebner, Ronald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Konstanz, Fachbereich Psychol, D-78457 Constance, Germany
关键词
Stroop task; task switching; response time distribution; cognitive conflict; STIMULUS-RESPONSE; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; TIME DISTRIBUTIONS; WORD; INTERFERENCE; COSTS; COLOR; SET; SUPPRESSION; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0016467
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It has been suggested that performance in the Stroop task is influenced by response conflict as well as task conflict. The present study investigated the idea that both conflict types can be isolated by applying ex-Gaussian distribution analysis which decomposes response time into a Gaussian and an exponential component. Two experiments were conducted in which manual versions of a standard Stroop task (Experiment 1) and a separated Stroop task (Experiment 2) were performed under task-switching conditions. Effects of response congruency and stimulus bivalency were used to measure response conflict and task conflict, respectively. Ex-Gaussian analysis revealed that response conflict was mainly observed in the Gaussian component, whereas task conflict was stronger in the exponential component. Moreover, task conflict in the exponential component was selectively enhanced under task-switching conditions. The results suggest that ex-Gaussian analysis can be used as a tool to isolate different conflict types in the Stroop task.
引用
收藏
页码:1398 / 1412
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Contingency learning is not affected by conflict experience: Evidence from a task conflict-free, item-specific Stroop paradigm
    Levin, Yulia
    Tzelgov, Joseph
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2016, 164 : 39 - 45
  • [22] The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task
    Krebs, Ruth M.
    Boehler, Carsten N.
    Woldorff, Marty G.
    COGNITION, 2010, 117 (03) : 341 - 347
  • [23] Practice makes better? The influence of increased practice on task conflict in the Stroop task
    Najenson, Jonathan
    Zaks-Ohayon, Rut
    Tzelgov, Joseph
    Fresco, Nir
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2025,
  • [24] Selective reinforcement of conflict processing in the Stroop task
    Prevel, Arthur
    Krebs, Ruth M.
    Kukkonen, Nanne
    Braem, Senne
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [25] ERP correlates of the conflict level in the multi-response Stroop task
    Chuderski, Adam
    Senderecka, Magdalena
    Kalamala, Patrycja
    Kroczek, Bartlomiej
    Ociepka, Michal
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 1650 : 93 - 102
  • [26] Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task
    Larson, Michael J.
    Kaufman, David A. S.
    Perlstein, William M.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (03) : 663 - 670
  • [27] Response Inhibition Modulates Response Conflict in Task Switching
    Grzyb, Kai Robin
    Huebner, Ronald
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 221 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [28] Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study
    Littman, Ran
    Kalanthroff, Eyal
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2021, 85 (06): : 2420 - 2427
  • [29] Application of the ex-Gaussian function to the effect of the word blindness suggestion on Stroop task performance suggests no word blindness
    Parris, Benjamin A.
    Dienes, Zoltan
    Hodgson, Timothy L.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [30] cTBS to Right DLPFC Modulates Physiological Correlates of Conflict Processing: Evidence from a Stroop task
    Xu, Ping
    Wang, Song
    Yang, Yulu
    Guragai, Bishal
    Zhang, Qiuzhu
    Zhang, Junjun
    Jin, Zhenlan
    Li, Ling
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2024, 37 (01) : 37 - 51