Could HPV Testing on Self-collected Samples Be Routinely Used in an Organized Cervical Screening Program? A Modeled Analysis

被引:24
作者
Smith, Megan A. [1 ,2 ]
Hall, Michaela T. [1 ,3 ]
Saville, Marion [4 ,5 ]
Brotherton, Julia M. L. [6 ,7 ]
Simms, Kate T. [1 ,2 ]
Lew, Jie-Bin [1 ,2 ]
Bateson, Deborah [8 ,9 ]
Skinner, S. Rachel [10 ,11 ]
Kelaher, Margaret [7 ]
Canfell, Karen [1 ,2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Canc Council NSW, Canc Res Div, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] UNSW, Sch Math & Stat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] VCS Fdn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] VCS Fdn, VCS Populat Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Family Planning NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Discipline Obstet Gynaecol & Neonatol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Discipline Child & Adolescent Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[12] UNSW, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PREDICTED IMPACT; WOMEN; CANCER; PARTICIPATION; VACCINATION; CYTOLOGY; BARRIERS; KITS;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0998
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Cervical screening on self-collected samples has mainly been considered for targeted use in underscreened women. Updated evidence supports equivalent sensitivity of PCR-based human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected and clinician-collected samples. Methods: Using a well-established model, we compared the lifetime impact on cancer diagnoses and deaths resulting from cervical screening using self-collected samples only, with and without the existing restriction in Australia to women aged 30+ years and >= 2 years overdue, compared with the mainstream program of 5-yearly HPV screening on clinician-collected samples starting at 25 years of age. We conservatively assumed sensitivity of HPV testing on self-collected relative to clinician-collected samples was 0.98. Outcomes were estimated either in the context of HPV vaccination ("routinely vaccinated cohorts;" uptake as in Australia) or in the absence of HPV vaccination ("unvaccinated cohorts"). Results: In unvaccinated cohorts, the health benefits of increased participation from self-collection outweighed the worst case (2%) loss of relative test sensitivity even if only 15% of women, who would not otherwise attend, used it ("additional uptake"). In routinely vaccinated cohorts, population-wide self-collection could be marginally (0.2%-1.0%) less effective at 15% additional uptake but 6.2% to 12.4% more effective at 50% additional uptake. Most (56.6%-65.0%) of the loss in effectiveness in the restricted self-collection pathway in Australia results from the requirement to be 2 or more years overdue. Conclusions: Even under pessimistic assumptions, any potential loss in test sensitivity from self-collection is likely outweighed by improved program effectiveness resulting from feasible levels of increased uptake. Impact: Consideration could be given to offering self-collection more widely, potentially as an equal choice for women.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 277
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical performance and acceptability of self-collected vaginal and urine samples compared with clinician-taken cervical samples for HPV testing among women referred for colposcopy. A cross-sectional study
    Ornskov, Dorthe
    Jochumsen, Kirsten
    Steiner, Pernille Husted
    Grunnet, Ivan Moulun
    Lykkebo, Annemette Wildfang
    Waldstrom, Marianne
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [42] HIGH-RISK HPV testing as the primary screening method in an organized regional screening program for cervical cancer: the value of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping?
    Kares, Saara
    Veijalainen, Olga
    Kholova, Ivana
    Tirkkonen, Mika
    Vuento, Risto
    Huhtala, Heini
    Tuimala, Veronica
    Maenpaa, Johanna
    Kujala, Paula
    APMIS, 2019, 127 (11) : 710 - 716
  • [43] Design and feasibility of a novel program of cervical screening in Nigeria: self-sampled HPV testing paired with visual triage
    Desai, Kanan T.
    Ajenifuja, Kayode O.
    Banjo, Adekunbiola
    Adepiti, Clement A.
    Novetsky, Akiva
    Sebag, Cathy
    Einstein, Mark H.
    Oyinloye, Temitope
    Litwin, Tamara R.
    Horning, Matt
    Olanrewaju, Fatai Olatunde
    Oripelaye, Mufutau Muphy
    Afolabi, Esther
    Odujoko, Oluwole O.
    Castle, Philip E.
    Antani, Sameer
    Wilson, Ben
    Hu, Liming
    Mehanian, Courosh
    Demarco, Maria
    Gage, Julia C.
    Xue, Zhiyun
    Long, Leonard R.
    Cheung, Li
    Egemen, Didem
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    Schiffman, Mark
    INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [44] Optimal Positive Cutoff Points for careHPV Testing of Clinician- and Self-Collected Specimens in Primary Cervical Cancer Screening: an Analysis from Rural China
    Kang, Le-Ni
    Jeronimo, Jose
    Qiao, You-Lin
    Zhao, Fang-Hui
    Chen, Wen
    Valdez, Melissa
    Zhang, Xun
    Bansil, Pooja
    Paul, Proma
    Bai, Ping
    Peck, Roger
    Li, Jing
    Chen, Feng
    Stoler, Mark H.
    Castle, Philip E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (06) : 1954 - 1961
  • [45] Performance and pre-analytical stability of self-collected samples versus clinician cervical samples for the detection of HPV16, HPV18 and a pool of 12 other HPV types on the Roche Cobas 8800 System
    Ilardo, Claudio
    Marguerettaz, Melanie
    Breton, Alain
    Azzoug, Tacfarinas
    Schmitt, Nelly
    Fournier, Remi
    Bayette, Jeremy
    Teissier, Guillaume
    Lelarge, Christian
    Ponseille, Benoit
    NEW MICROBIOLOGICA, 2022, 45 (02) : 111 - 114
  • [46] Safety and acceptability of human papillomavirus testing of self-collected specimens: A methodologic study of the impact of collection devices and HPV assays on sensitivity for cervical cancer and high-grade lesions
    Leinonen, Maarit K.
    Schee, Kristina
    Jonassen, Christine M.
    Lie, A. Kathrine
    Nystrand, Camilla F.
    Rangberg, Anbjorg
    Furre, Ingegerd E.
    Johansson, Marzena J.
    Trope, Ameli
    Sjoborg, Katrine D.
    Castle, Philip E.
    Nygard, Mari
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2018, 99-100 : 22 - 30
  • [47] Equal prevalence of severe cervical dysplasia by HPV self-sampling and by midwife-collected samples for primary HPV screening: a randomised controlled trial
    Hellsten, Caroline
    Ernstson, Avalon
    Bodelsson, Gunilla
    Forslund, Ola
    Borgfeldt, Christer
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2021, 30 (04) : 334 - 340
  • [48] Feasibility of sending a direct send HPV self-sampling kit to long-term non-attenders in an organized cervical screening program
    Sahlgren, Hanna
    Sparen, Par
    Elfgren, Kristina
    Elfstrom, K. Miriam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 268 : 68 - 73
  • [49] Improved Rates of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Transmasculine Patients Through Self-Collected Swabs for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing
    Goldstein, Zil
    Martinson, Tyler
    Ramachandran, Shruti
    Lindner, Rebecca
    Safer, Joshua D.
    TRANSGENDER HEALTH, 2020, 5 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [50] Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial
    Polman, Nicole J.
    Ebisch, Renee M. F.
    Heideman, Danielle A. M.
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    Bekkers, Ruud L. M.
    Molijn, Anco C.
    Meijer, Chris L. M.
    Quint, Wim G., V
    Snijders, Peter J. F.
    Massuger, Leon F. A. G.
    van Kemenade, Folkert J.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (02) : 229 - 238