Could HPV Testing on Self-collected Samples Be Routinely Used in an Organized Cervical Screening Program? A Modeled Analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Smith, Megan A. [1 ,2 ]
Hall, Michaela T. [1 ,3 ]
Saville, Marion [4 ,5 ]
Brotherton, Julia M. L. [6 ,7 ]
Simms, Kate T. [1 ,2 ]
Lew, Jie-Bin [1 ,2 ]
Bateson, Deborah [8 ,9 ]
Skinner, S. Rachel [10 ,11 ]
Kelaher, Margaret [7 ]
Canfell, Karen [1 ,2 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Canc Council NSW, Canc Res Div, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] UNSW, Sch Math & Stat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] VCS Fdn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] VCS Fdn, VCS Populat Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Family Planning NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Discipline Obstet Gynaecol & Neonatol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Discipline Child & Adolescent Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[12] UNSW, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PREDICTED IMPACT; WOMEN; CANCER; PARTICIPATION; VACCINATION; CYTOLOGY; BARRIERS; KITS;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0998
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Cervical screening on self-collected samples has mainly been considered for targeted use in underscreened women. Updated evidence supports equivalent sensitivity of PCR-based human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected and clinician-collected samples. Methods: Using a well-established model, we compared the lifetime impact on cancer diagnoses and deaths resulting from cervical screening using self-collected samples only, with and without the existing restriction in Australia to women aged 30+ years and >= 2 years overdue, compared with the mainstream program of 5-yearly HPV screening on clinician-collected samples starting at 25 years of age. We conservatively assumed sensitivity of HPV testing on self-collected relative to clinician-collected samples was 0.98. Outcomes were estimated either in the context of HPV vaccination ("routinely vaccinated cohorts;" uptake as in Australia) or in the absence of HPV vaccination ("unvaccinated cohorts"). Results: In unvaccinated cohorts, the health benefits of increased participation from self-collection outweighed the worst case (2%) loss of relative test sensitivity even if only 15% of women, who would not otherwise attend, used it ("additional uptake"). In routinely vaccinated cohorts, population-wide self-collection could be marginally (0.2%-1.0%) less effective at 15% additional uptake but 6.2% to 12.4% more effective at 50% additional uptake. Most (56.6%-65.0%) of the loss in effectiveness in the restricted self-collection pathway in Australia results from the requirement to be 2 or more years overdue. Conclusions: Even under pessimistic assumptions, any potential loss in test sensitivity from self-collection is likely outweighed by improved program effectiveness resulting from feasible levels of increased uptake. Impact: Consideration could be given to offering self-collection more widely, potentially as an equal choice for women.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 277
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cervical cancer prevention among long-term screening non-attendees by vaginal self-collected samples for hr-HPV mRNA detection
    Ernstson, Avalon
    Urdell, Annika
    Forslund, Ola
    Borgfeldt, Christer
    INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [22] Concordance analysis of methylation biomarkers detection in self-collected and physician-collected samples in cervical neoplasm
    Chang, Cheng-Chang
    Huang, Rui-Lan
    Liao, Yu-Ping
    Su, Po-Hsuan
    Hsu, Yaw-Wen
    Wang, Hui-Chen
    Tien, Chau-Yang
    Yu, Mu-Hsien
    Lin, Ya-Wen
    Lai, Hung-Cheng
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [23] Human papillomavirus testing and cytology using physician-collected uterine cervical samples vs. self-collected vaginal samples and urine samples
    Terada, Noriko
    Matsuura, Motoki
    Kurokawa, Shoko
    Nishimura, Yoko
    Tamate, Masato
    Isoyama, Kyoko
    Yamazaki, Satoko
    Shimada, Hiroshi
    Suzuki, Masahiro
    Tabuchi, Yuta
    Teramoto, Mizue
    Saito, Tsuyoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 27 (11) : 1742 - 1749
  • [24] Suitability of Self-Collected Vaginal Samples for Cervical Cancer Screening in Periurban Villages in Andhra Pradesh, India
    Sowjanya, A. Pavani
    Paul, Proma
    Vedantham, Haripriya
    Ramakrishna, Gayatri
    Vidyadhari, D.
    Vijayaraghavan, K.
    Laksmi, Shantha
    Sudula, Mrudula
    Ronnett, Brigitte M.
    Das, Manik
    Shah, Keerti V.
    Gravitt, Patti E.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (05) : 1373 - 1378
  • [25] Projected cost-effectiveness of repeat high-risk human papillomavirus testing using self-collected vaginal samples in the Swedish cervical cancer screening program
    Ostensson, Ellinor
    Hellstrom, Ann-Cathrin
    Hellman, Kristina
    Gustavsson, Inger
    Gyllensten, Ulf
    Wilander, Erik
    Zethraeus, Niklas
    Andersson, Sonia
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (07) : 830 - 840
  • [26] Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening with 7-Type HPV mRNA E6/E7 Testing on Self-Collected Samples: Multicentric Insights from Mexico
    Flores, Carlos Eduardo Aranda
    Falang, Bente Marie
    Gomez-Laguna, Laura
    Gutierrez, Guillermo Gomez
    Leon, Jorge Miguel Ortiz
    Uribe, Miguel
    Cruz, Omar
    Sorbye, Sveinung Wergeland
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [27] Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis
    Arbyn, Marc
    Verdoodt, Freija
    Snijders, Peter J. F.
    Verhoef, Viola M. J.
    Suonio, Eero
    Dillner, Lena
    Minozzi, Silvia
    Bellisario, Cristina
    Banzi, Rita
    Zhao, Fang-Hui
    Hillemanns, Peter
    Anttila, Ahti
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (02) : 172 - 183
  • [28] HPV self-sampling in organized cervical cancer screening program: A randomized pilot study in Estonia in 2021
    Hallik, Reeli
    Innos, Kaire
    Janes, Jaak
    Joers, Kai
    Ratnik, Kaspar
    Veerus, Piret
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2025, 32 (01) : 19 - 27
  • [29] Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening by High-Risk Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing of Self-Collected Vaginal Samples
    Balasubramanian, Akhila
    Kulasingam, Shalini L.
    Baer, Atar
    Hughes, James P.
    Myers, Evan R.
    Mao, Constance
    Kiviat, Nancy B.
    Koutsky, Laura A.
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2010, 14 (03) : 185 - 195
  • [30] Does full HPV genotyping perform similarly well in clinician-collected cervical samples and self-collected vaginal samples when using the CLART HPV4S assay?
    Solnaes, Jannie Villekjaer
    Njor, Sisse Helle
    Tranberg, Mette
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)