Ankle brachial index measurement in primary care: are we doing it right?

被引:44
作者
Nicolai, Saskia P. A. [2 ]
Kruidenier, Lotte M. [2 ]
Rouwet, Ellen V. [3 ]
Bartelink, Marie-Louise E. L. [4 ]
Prins, Martin H. [5 ]
Teijink, Joep A. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, NL-5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Atrium Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Parkstad, Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
diagnosis; Doppler effect; intermittent claudication; peripheral vascular diseases; ultrasonography; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-DISEASE; PRESSURE INDEX; ANKLE/BRACHIAL INDEX; REPRODUCIBILITY; RELIABILITY; VARIABILITY; ASSOCIATION; DIAGNOSIS; PALPATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp09X420932
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The reference standard for diagnosing peripheral arterial disease in primary care is the ankle brachial index (ABI). Various methods to measure ankle and brachial blood pressures and to calculate the index are described. Aim To compare the ABI measurements performed in primary care with those performed in the vascular laboratory. Furthermore, an inventory was made of methods used to determine the ABI in primary care. Design of study Cross-sectional study. Setting Primary care practice and outpatient clinic. Method Consecutive patients suspected of peripheral arterial disease based on ABI assessment in primary care practices were included. The ABI measurements were repeated in the vascular laboratory. Referring GPs were interviewed about method of measurement and calculation of the index. From each patient the leg with the lower ABI was used for analysis. Results Ninety-nine patients of 45 primary care practices with a mean ABI of 0.80 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.27) were included. The mean ABI as measured in the vascular laboratory was 0.82 (SD = 0.26). A Bland-Altman plot demonstrated great variability between ABI measurements in primary care practice and the vascular laboratory. Both method of blood pressure measurements and method of calculating the ABI differed greatly between primary care practices. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the ABI is often not correctly determined in primary care practice. This phenomenon seems to be due to inaccurate methods for both blood pressure measurements and calculation of the index. A guideline for determining the ABI with a hand-held Doppler, and a training programme seem necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 427
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease in general practice: can the ankle-brachial index be measured either by pulse palpation or an automatic blood pressure device? [J].
Aboyans, V. ;
Lacroix, P. ;
Doucet, S. ;
Preux, P. -M. ;
Criqui, M. H. ;
Laskar, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 62 (07) :1001-1007
[2]   The intra- and interobserver variability of ankle-arm blood pressure index according to its mode of calculation [J].
Aboyans, V ;
Lacroix, P ;
Lebourdon, A ;
Preux, PM ;
Ferrières, J ;
Laskar, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03) :215-220
[3]  
BAKER JD, 1981, SURGERY, V89, P134
[4]  
BARTELINK ML, 2003, HUISARTS WET, V46, P848
[5]   Automated oscillometric determination of the ankle - Brachial index provides accuracy necessary for office practice [J].
Beckman, JA ;
Higgins, CO ;
Gerhard-Herman, M .
HYPERTENSION, 2006, 47 (01) :35-38
[6]   A clinical prediction model for the presence of peripheral arterial disease -: the benefit of screening individuals before initiation of measurement of the ankle-brachial index:: an observational study [J].
Bendermacher, Bianca L. W. ;
Teijink, Joep A. W. ;
Willigendael, Edith M. ;
Bartelink, Marie-Louise ;
Peters, Ron J. G. ;
de Bie, Rob A. ;
Buller, Harry R. ;
Boiten, Jelis ;
Langenberg, Machteld ;
Prins, Martin H. .
VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2007, 12 (01) :5-11
[7]  
Bendermacher BLW, 2006, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V56, P932
[8]  
BENDERMACHER BL, 2007, PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL, P6
[9]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[10]   The validity, reliability, reproducibility and extended utility of ankle to brachial pressure index in current vascular surgical practice [J].
Caruana, MF ;
Bradbury, AW ;
Adam, DJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 29 (05) :443-451