The Nature of Giving A Theory of Planned Behavior Examination of Corporate Philanthropy

被引:62
作者
Dennis, Bryan S. [1 ]
Buchholtz, Ann K. [2 ]
Butts, Marcus M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Dept Business, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Terry Coll Business, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Texas Arlington, Coll Business, Arlington, TX USA
关键词
strategic philanthropy; theory of planned behavior; corporate philanthropy; ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING; REASONED ACTION; SELF-EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; INTENTIONS; PREDICTION; ATTITUDES; INDIVIDUALS; PREFERENCES; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1177/0007650307305368
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Scholars of social issues in management have consistently argued that corporate philanthropy is one key factor of a firm's discretionary responsibilities. Several researchers have examined the links between philanthropy and such outcomes as financial profit and organizational reputation. It is interesting to note that the determinants of corporate philanthropy have been left largely unexamined; researchers have yet to fully understand why philanthropy takes place. In this manuscript, Ajzen's theory of planned behavior (TPB) provides the theoretical foundation for the development of a model that will further our understanding of corporate philanthropic behaviors. The TPB has been used and validated in many different academic fields (such as psychology, exercise science, and management information systems) as a means to understand the determinants of behavior. The authors build on the TPB and examine empirically how altruistic and strategic forces, perceived behavioral control, self-identity, and slack influence philanthropic behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 384
页数:25
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
[3]   Nature and operation of attitudes [J].
Ajzen, I .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :27-58
[4]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[5]   PREDICTION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR - ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL [J].
AJZEN, I ;
MADDEN, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (05) :453-474
[6]  
Ajzen I., 2005, Attitudes, personality and behavior, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60411-6
[7]  
Ajzen I., 1985, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[8]   The effects of past performance on top management team conflict in strategic decision making [J].
Amason, AC ;
Mooney, AC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 1999, 10 (04) :340-359
[9]  
[Anonymous], STRUCTURAL EQUATION
[10]   The theory of planned behaviour: Assessment of predictive validity and 'perceived control' [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 38 :35-54