Enrollee Experience with Providers in the Arkansas Medicaid Expansion Program

被引:1
作者
Bollinger, Mary [1 ,2 ]
Pyne, Jeff [1 ,2 ]
Goudie, Anthony [3 ,4 ]
Han, Xiaotong [1 ,2 ]
Hudson, Teresa J. [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, Joseph W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Little Rock, AR USA
[2] Cent Arkansas Vet Healthcare Syst, Ctr Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Res, North Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[3] Arkansas Ctr Hlth Improvement ACHI, Little Rock, AR USA
[4] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Fay W Boozman Coll Publ Hlth, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
Affordable Care Act; patient satisfaction; quality of care;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-020-06552-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patient ratings of their healthcare experience as a quality measure have become critically important since the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The ACA enabled states to expand Medicaid eligibility to reduce uninsurance nationally. Arkansas gained approval to use Medicaid funds to purchase a qualified health plan (QHP) through the ACA marketplace for newly eligible beneficiaries. Objective We compare patient-reported satisfaction between fee-for-service Medicaid and QHP participants. Design The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) was used to identify differences in Medicaid and QHP enrollee healthcare experiences. Data were analyzed using a regression discontinuity design. Participants Newly eligible Medicaid expansion participants enrolled in Medicaid during 2013 completed the Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey in 2014. Survey data was analyzed for 3156 participants (n = 1759 QHP/1397 Medicaid). Measures Measures included rating of personal and specialist provider, rating of all healthcare received, and whether the provider offered to communicate electronically. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the enrollees were controlled for in the analyses. Methods Regression-discontinuity analysis was used to evaluate differential program effects on positive ratings as measured by the CAHPS survey while controlling for demographic and health characteristics of participants. Key Results Adjusted logistic regression models for overall healthcare (OR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.56-0.90, p = 0.004) and personal doctor (OR = 0.68, 95%CI = 0.53-0.87, p = 0.002) predicted greater satisfaction among QHP versus Medicaid participants. Results were not significant for specialists or for use of electronic communication with provider. Conclusions Using a quasi-experimental statistical approach, we were able to control for observed and unobserved heterogeneity showing that among participants with similar characteristics, including income, QHP participants rated their personal providers and healthcare higher than those enrolled in Medicaid. Access to care, utilization of care, and healthcare and health insurance literacy may be contributing factors to these results.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1681
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2016, 16 CAHPS003 EF
[2]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality US Department of Health and Human Services., 2017, FIELDING CAHPS CLINI
[3]  
Aligning Forces for Quality RWJF, REPORT RESULTS CAHPS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, AM ACAD EMERGENCY ME
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PRACTICAL GUIDE REGR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HLTH LITERACY PRESCR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Health Reform Monitoring Survey, Health Care Access and Affordability among Lowand Moderate-Income Insured and Uninsured Adults under the Affordable Care Act
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LARGE RACIAL ETHNIC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Surveys
[10]  
Arkansas Center for Health Improvement (ACHI), 2016, SECTION 1115 DEMONST