Clinical and public health implications of glycemic relapse in type 2 diabetes

被引:3
作者
O'Connor, Patrick J. [1 ]
Sperl-Hillen, Joann [1 ]
机构
[1] HealthPartners Res Fdn, Minneapolis, MN 55440 USA
来源
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM | 2007年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
glycated hemoglobin; glycemic control; relapse; type; 2; diabetes;
D O I
10.1038/ncpendmet0354
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Although intensive therapeutic regimens can improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, glycemic relapse might subsequently occur. Objectives To determine the incidence of relapse following treatment of type 2 diabetes and to characterize factors that predict deterioration of glycemic control. Design and Intervention This was an outpatient study of adults with type 2 diabetes who were referred to an intensive diabetes care program. The 12-week program provided instruction in diabetes self-management and adjustment of medication. Insulin therapy was started if glycemic goals were not met with lifestyle modifications and hypoglycemic drugs. Patients initially received a bedtime dose of 0.3 U/kg of intermediate-acting or long-acting insulin, which was adjusted until a fasting plasma glucose level of <= 6.9 mmol/l was attained. If postprandial hyperglycemia persisted, patients were also given a rapid-acting insulin analog before meals. Patients were encouraged to self-adjust their insulin dose in response to home glucose monitoring. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels were measured at study entry, at 12 weeks, and every 6 months thereafter. The nadir HbA(1c) level was defined as the lowest HbA(1c) level achieved within 6 months of completing the program. Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was glycemic relapse, defined as the interval between the nadir HbA(1c) level and the first episode of hyperglycemia ( HbA(1c)>= 7%). Results A total of 393 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics of the study group included a mean age of 54.8 years, 50% female participants, 25% black participants, a mean BMI of 35 kg/m(2), a median duration of diabetes for 1.1 years, and a mean HbA(1c) level of 9.3%. Overall, 126 patients were receiving insulin. The mean duration of diabetes was 5.3 years in patients receiving insulin and 0.3 years in those not receiving insulin (P<0.001). Additionally, patients receiving insulin had a mean weight gain of 1.1 kg during the program, whereas patients not receiving insulin had a mean weight loss of 2.2 kg (P<0.001). Treatment with insulin was associated with a high risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5). The probability of relapse in the group receiving insulin was 56% after 1 year and 86% after 3 years, compared with 38% and 70%, respectively, for the group not receiving insulin. The median time to relapse was 7.7 months and the incidence rate for relapse was 0.84 per person-year for patients receiving insulin, whereas for patients not receiving insulin the median time to relapse was 19.9 months and the incidence rate for relapse was 0.42 per person-year. Duration of diabetes >= 1 year also predicted relapse (HR 1.6); however, weight loss >= 4.5 kg was associated with a decreased risk of relapse among patients not receiving insulin (HR 0.6). Conclusion There was a high incidence of relapse in patients after intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes; duration of disease and insulin treatment both predicted loss of glycemic control.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 11
页数:2
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Improving medication adherence - Challenges for physicians, payers, and policy makers [J].
O'Connor, Patrick J. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (17) :1802-1804
[2]   Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002 [J].
Saaddine, JB ;
Cadwell, B ;
Gregg, EW ;
Engelgau, MM ;
Vinicor, F ;
Imperatore, G ;
Narayan, KMV .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (07) :465-474
[3]  
Sperl-Hillen J, 2005, DIABETES, V54, pA303
[4]  
Sperl-Hillen JM, 2005, AM J MANAG CARE, V11, pS177
[5]   Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) [J].
Turner, RC ;
Holman, RR ;
Cull, CA ;
Stratton, IM ;
Matthews, DR ;
Frighi, V ;
Manley, SE ;
Neil, A ;
McElroy, K ;
Wright, D ;
Kohner, E ;
Fox, C ;
Hadden, D ;
Mehta, Z ;
Smith, A ;
Nugent, Z ;
Peto, R ;
Adlel, AI ;
Mann, JI ;
Bassett, PA ;
Oakes, SF ;
Dornan, TL ;
Aldington, S ;
Lipinski, H ;
Collum, R ;
Harrison, K ;
MacIntyre, C ;
Skinner, S ;
Mortemore, A ;
Nelson, D ;
Cockley, S ;
Levien, S ;
Bodsworth, L ;
Willox, R ;
Biggs, T ;
Dove, S ;
Beattie, E ;
Gradwell, M ;
Staples, S ;
Lam, R ;
Taylor, F ;
Leung, L ;
Carter, RD ;
Brownlee, SM ;
Fisher, KE ;
Islam, K ;
Jelfs, R ;
Williams, PA ;
Williams, FA ;
Sutton, PJ .
LANCET, 1998, 352 (9131) :837-853