Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study

被引:18
作者
Alhammadi, Sara Hussain [1 ]
Burnside, Girvan [2 ]
Milosevic, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohamed Bin Rashid Univ Med & Hlth Sci MBRU, Hamdan Bin Mohamed Coll Dent Med, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Waterhouse Bldg,Block F,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Merseyside, England
关键词
Dental implants; Bone loss; Technical complications;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-021-01530-2
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background This study assessed retrospectively the clinical outcomes of single implant-supported crowns and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Methods This case series compared biological and technical complications in single implant-supported crowns and implant-supported bridges in a time framed sample of all patients who received dental implants between 2009 and 2016 in Dubai Health Authority. Only 3-unit implant-supported prostheses (FDPs) with one intervening pontic and an implant each end were included for comparison to single crown supported implants. Cantilevered implants, implant-supported dentures and cases involving bone grafts or sinus lifts were excluded. The primary outcome measure was marginal bone loss, measured on digital radiographs taken after prosthesis placement at baseline and one year after implant loading, whilst peri-implantitis and technical complications were secondary outcomes. Mixed regression models adjusted for clustering of implants within patients was used for patient and implant factor associations. Results A total of 454 patients (152 males; 302 females) had 1673 implants. The mean age of males (53.7 years, SD 14.6) was significantly greater than females (49.3 years, SD 12.9, p < 0.001). Mean mesial bone loss on the FDPs was significantly greater at 1 year (1.14 mm, SD 0.63) compared with the mesial surface of single implant-supported crowns (0.30 mm, SD 0.43, p < 0.001). Mean distal bone loss was also significantly greater at 1 year on the distal surfaces of implants supporting bridgework (1.29 mm, SD 0.71) compared with distal surfaces on single implant-supported crowns (0.36 mm, SD 0.54, p < 0.001). Mean marginal bone loss mesially and distally around implants placed in the lower anterior sextant was significantly greater compared to all other sites (p < 0.001). Bone loss by gender, patient's age and medical condition was not different between the 2 implant groups. Screw loosening was the main technical complication (11.5%) whilst peri-implantitis occurred rarely (0.5%). The 66 cement retained implants had significantly more complications compared to the 1607 screw retained implants (p < 0.001). Conclusions Mean marginal bone loss around the supporting implants of FDPs (3-unit fixed bridgework) was greater than on single implant-supported crowns at one year after implant loading. Position in the mouth was associated with bone loss. Biological and technical complications occurred rarely.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants in Maxilla and Mandible: One Year Prospective Clinical Study [J].
Ajanovic, Muhamed ;
Hamzic, Adis ;
Redzepagic, Sead ;
Kamber-cesir, Alma ;
Kazazic, Lejla ;
Tosum, Selma .
ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2015, 49 (02) :128-136
[2]   Patterns of tobacco use in the United Arab Emirates Healthy Future (UAEHFS) pilot study [J].
Al-Houqani, Mohammed ;
Leinberger-Jabari, Andrea ;
Al Naeemi, Abdullah ;
Al Junaibi, Abdullah ;
Al Zaabi, Eiman ;
Oumeziane, Naima ;
Kazim, Marina ;
Al Maskari, Fatima ;
Al Dhaheri, Ayesha ;
Wareth, Leila Abdel ;
Al Mahmeed, Wael ;
Alsafar, Habiba ;
Al Anouti, Fatme ;
Abdulle, Abdishakur ;
Inman, Claire K. ;
Al Hamiz, Aisha ;
Haji, Muna ;
Ahn, Jiyoung ;
Kirchhoff, Tomas ;
Hayes, Richard B. ;
Supsup, Ravichandran Ramasamy ;
Schmidt, Ann Marie ;
El Shahawy, Omar ;
Weitzman, Michael ;
Supsup, Raghib Ali ;
Sherman, Scott .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05)
[3]  
Albrektsson T, 1986, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V1, P11
[4]   NO CLEAR EVIDENCE REGARDING THE EFFECT OF OSTEOPOROSIS ON DENTAL IMPLANT FAILURE [J].
Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen ;
Radi, Iman Abd-Elwahab .
JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2016, 16 (02) :124-126
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, DUBAI ANN HLTH STAT
[6]  
Ansari K, 2017, INT J HEALTH SCI-IJH, V11, P56
[7]   Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido ;
de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo ;
de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto ;
Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira ;
Verri, Fellippo Ramos ;
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (04) :419-427
[8]   THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT DIAMETER AND LENGTH ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS RELATED TO CRESTAL BONE GEOMETRY: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS [J].
Baggi, Luigi ;
Cappelloni, Ilaria ;
Di Girolamo, Michele ;
Maceri, Franco ;
Vairo, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (06) :422-431
[9]   Impact of Different Surgeons on Dental Implant Failure [J].
Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos ;
Kisch, Jeno ;
Albrektsson, Tomas ;
Wennerberg, Ann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 30 (05) :445-454
[10]   Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results [J].
Clelland, Nancy ;
Chaudhry, Jahanzeb ;
Rashid, Robert G. ;
McGlumphy, Edwin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (05) :1135-1141