Some design considerations incorporating early futility for single-arm clinical trials with time-to-event primary endpoints using Weibull distribution

被引:5
作者
Waleed, Muhammad [1 ]
He, Jianghua [1 ]
Phadnis, Milind A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
关键词
Group sequential designs; repeated significance testing; sample size calculation; stochastic curtailment methods; survival analysis; OPTIMAL 2-STAGE DESIGNS; PHASE-II; PREDICTIVE PROBABILITY; SAMPLE; CURTAILMENT; BOUNDARIES; SURVIVAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/pst.2097
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Sample size calculation is an essential component of the planning phase of a clinical trial. In the context of single-arm clinical trials with time-to-event (TTE) endpoints, only a few options with limited design features are available. Motivated from ethical or practical considerations, two-stage designs are implemented for single-arm studies to obtain early evidence of futility. A major drawback of such designs is that early stopping may only occur at the conclusion of the first stage, even if lack of efficacy becomes apparent at any other time point over the course of the clinical trial. In this manuscript, we attempt to fill some existing gaps in the literature related to single-arm clinical trials with TTE endpoints. We propose a parametric maximum likelihood estimate-based test whose variance component accounts for the expected proportion of loss to follow-up and different accrual patterns (early, late, or uniform accrual). For the proposed method, we present three stochastic curtailment methods (conditional power, predictive power, Bayesian predictive probability) which can be employed for efficacy or futility testing purposes. Finally, we discuss the implementation of group sequential designs for obtaining an early evidence of efficacy or futility at pre-planned timings of interim analyses. Through extensive simulations, it is shown that our proposed method performs well for designing these studies with moderate to large sample sizes. Some examples are presented to demonstrate various aspects of the stochastic curtailment and repeated significance testing methods presented in this manuscript.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 644
页数:35
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] ANDERSEN PK, 1987, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V8, P67
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, PASS 14 POWER ANAL S
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, SAS 9 4
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, NQUERY 8 POW SAMPL S
  • [5] REPEATED SIGNIFICANCE TESTS ON ACCUMULATING DATA
    ARMITAGE, P
    MCPHERSO.CK
    ROWE, BC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-GENERAL, 1969, 132 : 235 - &
  • [6] Casella G., 2002, STAT INFERENCE
  • [7] MONITORING CLINICAL-TRIALS BASED ON PREDICTIVE PROBABILITY OF SIGNIFICANCE
    CHOI, SC
    PEPPLE, PA
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1989, 45 (01) : 317 - 323
  • [8] DATA MONITORING IN CLINICAL-TRIALS - THE CASE FOR STOCHASTIC CURTAILMENT
    DAVIS, BR
    HARDY, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (09) : 1033 - 1042
  • [9] Bayesian predictive approach to interim monitoring in clinical trials
    Dmitrienko, A
    Wang, MD
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (13) : 2178 - 2195
  • [10] Dmitrienko A., 2005, ANAL CLIN TRIALS USI