Critical Review of Outcomes from Radical Cystectomy: Can Complications from Radical Cystectomy Be Reduced by Surgical Volume and Robotic Surgery?

被引:48
|
作者
Moschini, Marco [1 ]
Simone, Giuseppe [2 ]
Stenzl, Arnulf [3 ]
Gill, Inderbir S. [4 ]
Catto, James [5 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, URI Milan, Div Oncol, Unit Urol, Milan, Italy
[2] Regina Elena Inst Canc Res, Dept Urol, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Urol, Tubingen, Germany
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Inst Urol, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[5] Univ Sheffield, Acad Urol Unit, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2016年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
Bladder cancer; Radical cystectomy; Complications; Surgeon volume; Surgical volume; Perioperative outcomes; Robot-assisted radical cystectomy; EXTRACORPOREAL URINARY-DIVERSION; PERIOPERATIVE BLOOD-TRANSFUSION; CLAVIEN CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; BLADDER-CANCER; ENHANCED RECOVERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; STANDARDIZED ANALYSIS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a highly complex procedure with multiple risks for perioperative complications. Objective: We reviewed the literature to report perioperative outcomes and the incidence of complications in contemporary RC series. We focused on the potential impact of surgical approach and surgeon volume on these outcomes. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature search was performed in December 2015 using the Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for articles published in English between 2005 and 2015. The search strategy included the terms complications, cystectomy, robotic assisted radical cystectomy, and surgical volume, alone or in combination. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Evidence synthesis: Our searches retrieved 49 papers. Open RC (ORC) and robot-assisted RC (RARC) are morbid procedures with consistent risk of perioperative complications (mean weighted incidence: 48.7%; range: 27.0-72.5%). Higher hospital and surgeon volumes were associated with reduced risks of perioperative complications. Prior robotic expertise in radical prostatectomy showed a beneficial protective risk on development of complications after RARC. Surgical volume appears to be a good predictor of safety in ORC and RARC. RARC is associated with reduced estimated blood loss and lower perioperative transfusion rates compared with ORC. Further evidence is needed to support the reproducibility of intracorporeal diversion during RARC, beyond large tertiary referral centers. Several strategies have been demonstrated to be effective for reducing the risk of incurring perioperative complications and should be pursued by physicians. Conclusions: Despite improvements in quality of care, RC remains a challenging procedure with high morbidity, regardless of surgical approach. RARC is a safe procedure with potential advantages in terms of reduced blood loss and transfusion rates. Surgical volume appears to be related to the improvement of perioperative outcomes and complications. Patient summary: Radical cystectomy is a challenging and morbid procedure. The robotic approach has gained popularity and proved to be safe and effective in tertiary referral centers, although further studies are needed to confirm its wide reproducibility. Centers with higher surgical volume have lower incidence of perioperative complications. (C) 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 29
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: history, techniques and outcomes
    Liss, Michael A.
    Kader, A. Karim
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 31 (03) : 489 - 497
  • [42] The changing pattern of mortality and morbidity from radical cystectomy
    Rosario, DJ
    Becker, M
    Anderson, JB
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (04) : 427 - 430
  • [43] Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Cystectomy: Pre-Operative Data of 1400 Patients From The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Colicchia, Michele
    Palmer, Katie
    Artibani, Walter
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Bocciardi, Aldo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Carini, Marco
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    Cormio, Luigi
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Maggi, Martina
    de Cobelli, Ottavio
    Ferro, Matteo
    Musi, Gennaro
    Ercolino, Amelio
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Gallina, Andrea
    Introini, Carlo
    Mearini, Ettore
    Cochetti, Giovanni
    Minervini, Andrea
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Serni, Sergio
    Simeone, Claudio
    Parma, Paolo
    Serao, Armando
    Mangano, Mario Salvatore
    Pomara, Giorgio
    Ditonno, Pasquale
    Simonato, Alchiede
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Porreca, Angelo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [44] Robotic Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Surgical and Pathological Outcomes in 100 Consecutive Cases
    Pruthi, Raj S.
    Nielsen, Matthew E.
    Nix, Jeff
    Smith, Angela
    Schultz, Heather
    Wallen, Eric M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) : 510 - 514
  • [45] The View Outside of the Box: Reporting Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy Using Pentafecta From a Multicenter Retrospective Analysis
    Zapala, Lukasz
    Slusarczyk, Aleksander
    Korczak, Bartlomiej
    Kurzyna, Pawel
    Leki, Mikolaj
    Lipinski, Piotr
    Milow, Jerzy
    Niemczyk, Michal
    Pochec, Kamil
    Pozniak, Michal
    Przudzik, Maciej
    Suchojad, Tomasz
    Wolanski, Rafal
    Zapala, Piotr
    Drewa, Tomasz
    Roslan, Marek
    Rozanski, Waldemar
    Wrobel, Andrzej
    Radziszewski, Piotr
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [46] Upstaging and Survival Outcomes for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy: Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium
    Iqbal, Umar
    Elsayed, Ahmed S.
    Jing, Zhe
    Stockle, Michael
    Wijburg, Carl
    Wiklund, Peter
    Hosseini, Abolfazl
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Khan, Mohammad Shamim
    Hemal, Ashok
    Kim, Eric
    Wagner, Andrew A.
    Gaboardi, Franco
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Maatman, Thomas J.
    Balbay, Derya
    Li, Qiang
    Hussein, Ahmed A.
    Guru, Khurshid A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (10) : 1541 - 1547
  • [47] Oncologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results of a High-Volume Robotic Center
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    De Groote, Ruben
    Geurts, Nicolas
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Novara, Giacomo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) : 75 - 82
  • [48] Trends of radical cystectomy and comparisons of surgical outcomes among surgical approaches focusing on robot-assisted radical cystectomy: A Japanese nationwide database study
    Chen, Wei
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Kobayashi, Masaki
    Fan, Bo
    Fukuda, Shohei
    Waseda, Yuma
    Tanaka, Hajime
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Ai, Masumi
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Nonomura, Norio
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (03) : 258 - 263
  • [49] Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: current technique and outcomes
    Steinberg, Peter L.
    Ghavamian, Reza
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2012, 12 (07) : 913 - 917
  • [50] National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator poorly predicts complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion
    Golan, Shay
    Adamsky, Melanie A.
    Johnson, Scott C.
    Barashi, Nimrod S.
    Smith, Zachary L.
    Rodriguez, Maria V.
    Liao, Chuanhong
    Smith, Norm D.
    Steinberg, Gary D.
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (02) : 77.e1 - 77.e7