Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:232
作者
Partridge, SC
Gibbs, JE
Lu, Y
Esserman, LJ
Sudilovsky, D
Hylton, NM
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, Magnet Resonance Sci Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Mt Zion Med Ctr, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[3] Marin Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Greenbrae, CA 94904 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791193
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Our study investigated the usefulness of contrast-enhanced MR imaging for accurately measuring the size of residual tumor after patients have undergone neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemotherapy. The imaging analysis method was optimized for identifying residual disease in the treated breast. Tumor sizes measured on the MR images and at the clinical examination were compared with the size of residual disease measured at pathology after surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Before undergoing surgery, 52 patients were imaged before and after receiving ncoadjuvant chemotherapy. For each patient, specific malignancy criteria were applied to MR images before chemotherapy to identify the location of tumor, and residual disease was then identified as any remaining enhancement in the same area on the MR images after chemotherapy. Residual tumor size was measured using both the MR technique and the clinical examination findings, and the degree of measurement error for each method was assessed in comparison with the pathologic findings. RESULTS. The correlation with pathology was an r value of 0.89 for MR measurements compared with an r value of 0.60 for clinical measurements. In addition, MR imaging revealed all cases of residual disease, whereas clinical assessment resulted in five false-negative interpretations in the 52 treated lesions. CONCLUSION. The high correlation between measurements of residual disease obtained on MR images and those obtained at pathology validates the sensitivity of MR imaging of the breast after chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1199
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Abraham DC, 1996, CANCER, V78, P91, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<91::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-2
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: Evidence for improved preoperative staging [J].
Esserman, L ;
Hylton, N ;
Yassa, L ;
Barclay, J ;
Frankel, S ;
Sickles, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :110-119
[5]   INVERSION IN THE STEADY-STATE - CONTRAST OPTIMIZATION AND REDUCED IMAGING TIME WITH FAST 3-DIMENSIONAL INVERSION-RECOVERY - PREPARED GRE PULSE SEQUENCES [J].
FOO, TKF ;
SAWYER, AM ;
FAULKNER, WH ;
MILLS, DG .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (01) :85-90
[6]   LOCAL ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - CONTRAST-ENHANCED SUBTRACTION MR-IMAGING OF RESPONSE TO PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
GILLES, R ;
GUINEBRETIERE, JM ;
TOUSSAINT, C ;
SPIELMAN, M ;
RIETJENS, M ;
PETIT, JY ;
CONTESSO, G ;
MASSELOT, J ;
VANEL, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (03) :633-638
[7]   Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography [J].
Malur, S ;
Wurdinger, S ;
Moritz, A ;
Michels, W ;
Schneider, A .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2001, 3 (01) :55-60
[8]  
Partridge SC, 1999, ST HEAL T, V62, P259
[9]   MRI of breast cancer: Influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity [J].
Rieber, A ;
Zeitler, H ;
Rosenthal, H ;
Gorich, J ;
Kreienberg, R ;
Brambs, HJ ;
Tomczak, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) :452-458
[10]  
Tsuboi N, 1999, ONCOL REP, V6, P727