Implementing and Assessing an Alchemical Method for Calculating Protein-Protein Binding Free Energy

被引:22
作者
Patel, Dharmeshkumar [1 ]
Patel, Jagdish Suresh [1 ,2 ]
Ytreberg, F. Marty [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Inst Modeling Collaborat & Innovat, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] Univ Idaho, Dept Biol Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, Dept Phys, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
NONEQUILIBRIUM MEASUREMENTS; DYNAMICS; SIMULATIONS; PREDICTION; COMPLEXES; ACCURATE; MUTATIONS; MODELS; WATER;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01045
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Protein-protein binding is fundamental to most biological processes. It is important to be able to use computation to accurately estimate the change in protein-protein binding free energy due to mutations in order to answer biological questions that would be experimentally challenging, laborious, or time-consuming. Although nonrigorous free-energy methods are faster, rigorous alchemical molecular dynamics-based methods are considerably more accurate and are becoming more feasible with the advancement of computer hardware and molecular simulation software. Even with sufficient computational resources, there are still major challenges to using alchemical free-energy methods for protein-protein complexes, such as generating hybrid structures and topologies, maintaining a neutral net charge of the system when there is a charge-changing mutation, and setting up the simulation. In the current study, we have used the pmx package to generate hybrid structures and topologies, and a double-system/single-box approach to maintain the net charge of the system. To test the approach, we predicted relative binding affinities for two protein-protein complexes using a nonequilibrium alchemical method based on the Crooks fluctuation theorem and compared the results with experimental values. The method correctly identified stabilizing from destabilizing mutations for a small protein-protein complex, and a larger, more challenging antibody complex. Strong correlations were obtained between predicted and experimental relative binding affinities for both protein-protein systems.
引用
收藏
页码:2457 / 2464
页数:8
相关论文
共 65 条
[21]   pmx Webserver: A User Friendly Interface for Alchemistry [J].
Gapsyse, Vytautas ;
de Groot, Bert L. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2017, 57 (02) :109-114
[22]   Accuracy and Convergence of Free Energy Differences Calculated from Nonequilibrium Switching Processes [J].
Goette, Maik ;
Grubmueller, Helmut .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 30 (03) :447-456
[23]   Transferable Mixing of Atomistic and Coarse-Grained Water Models [J].
Gonzalez, Humberto C. ;
Darre, Leonardo ;
Pantano, Sergio .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2013, 117 (46) :14438-14448
[24]   Protein-protein interactions: scoring schemes and binding affinity [J].
Gromiha, M. Michael ;
Yugandhar, K. ;
Jemimah, Sherlyn .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 44 :31-38
[25]   Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations [J].
Guerois, R ;
Nielsen, JE ;
Serrano, L .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2002, 320 (02) :369-387
[26]   Standard Binding Free Energies from Computer Simulations: What Is the Best Strategy? [J].
Gumbart, James C. ;
Roux, Benoit ;
Chipot, Christophe .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 9 (01) :794-802
[27]   SKEMPI 2.0: an updated benchmark of changes in protein-protein binding energy, kinetics and thermodynamics upon mutation [J].
Jankauskaite, Justina ;
Jimenez-Garcia, Brian ;
Dapkunas, Justas ;
Fernandez-Recio, Juan ;
Moal, Iain H. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 35 (03) :462-469
[28]   Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences [J].
Jarzynski, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1997, 78 (14) :2690-2693
[29]   Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach [J].
Jarzynski, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1997, 56 (05) :5018-5035
[30]   COMPARISON OF SIMPLE POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR SIMULATING LIQUID WATER [J].
JORGENSEN, WL ;
CHANDRASEKHAR, J ;
MADURA, JD ;
IMPEY, RW ;
KLEIN, ML .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1983, 79 (02) :926-935