Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics

被引:211
作者
Ippoliti, Matteo [1 ]
Gullans, Michael J. [2 ]
Gopalakrishnan, Sarang [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huse, David A. [2 ,6 ]
Khemani, Vedika [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Phys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Phys, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] CUNY Coll Staten Isl, Dept Engn Sci & Phys, Staten Isl, NY 10314 USA
[4] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Initiat Theoret Sci, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Phys, 104 Davey Lab, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Inst Adv Study, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
Quantum entanglement - Phase diagrams - Quantum optics;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011030
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Unitary circuits subject to repeated projective measurements can undergo an entanglement phase transition (EPT) as a function of the measurement rate. This transition is generally understood in terms of a competition between the scrambling effects of unitary dynamics and the disentangling effects of measurements. We find that, surprisingly, EPTs are possible even in the absence of scrambling unitary dynamics, where they are best understood as arising from measurements alone. This finding motivates us to introduce measurement-only models, in which the "scrambling" and "unscrambling" effects driving the EPT are fundamentally intertwined and cannot be attributed to physically distinct processes. These models represent a novel form of an EPT, conceptually distinct from that in hybrid unitary-projective circuits. We explore the entanglement phase diagrams, critical points, and quantum code properties of some of these measurement-only models. We find that the principle driving the EPTs in these models is frustration, or mutual incompatibility, of the measurements. Surprisingly, an entangling (volume-law) phase is the generic outcome when measuring sufficiently long but still local (greater than or similar to 3-body) operators. We identify a class of exceptions to this behavior ("bipartite ensembles") which cannot sustain an entangling phase but display dual area-law phases, possibly with different kinds of quantum order, separated by self-dual critical points. Finally, we introduce a measure of information spreading in dynamics with measurements and use it to demonstrate the emergence of a statistical light cone, despite the nonlocality inherent to quantum measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 105 条
[71]   Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits [J].
Nahum, Adam ;
Vijay, Sagar ;
Haah, Jeongwan .
PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2018, 8 (02)
[72]   Quantum Entanglement Growth under Random Unitary Dynamics [J].
Nahum, Adam ;
Ruhman, Jonathan ;
Vijay, Sagar ;
Haah, Jeongwan .
PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2017, 7 (03)
[73]   Many-Body Localization and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Mechanics [J].
Nandkishore, Rahul ;
Huse, David A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, VOL 6, 2015, 6 :15-38
[74]   Quantum computation by measurement and quantum memory [J].
Nielsen, MA .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 2003, 308 (2-3) :96-100
[75]   Many-body localization phase transition [J].
Pal, Arijeet ;
Huse, David A. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2010, 82 (17)
[76]   Can we study the many-body localisation transition? [J].
Panda, R. K. ;
Scardicchio, A. ;
Schulz, M. ;
Taylor, S. R. ;
Znidaric, M. .
EPL, 2019, 128 (06)
[77]   Nonequilibrium dynamics of bosonic atoms in optical lattices: Decoherence of many-body states due to spontaneous emission [J].
Pichler, H. ;
Daley, A. J. ;
Zoller, P. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2010, 82 (06)
[78]   A random unitary circuit model for black hole evaporation [J].
Piroli, Lorenzo ;
Suenderhauf, Christoph ;
Qi, Xiao-Liang .
JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2020, 2020 (04)
[79]  
Planat M, 2008, QUANTUM INF COMPUT, V8, P127
[80]   Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems [J].
Polkovnikov, Anatoli ;
Sengupta, Krishnendu ;
Silva, Alessandro ;
Vengalattore, Mukund .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2011, 83 (03) :863-883