Association of ACK1, TFRC polymorphism with diarrhoeagenic E. coli adhesion patterns and their jejunal expression profile in Indian Ghurrah pigs

被引:0
作者
Rawat, Chandrakanta [1 ]
Sahoo, Nihar Ranjan [1 ,2 ]
Wagh, Shivaji S. [1 ]
Kumar, Pushpendra [1 ]
Kumar, Subodh [1 ]
Sonwane, Arvind [1 ]
Qureshi, Salauddin [3 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
Panigrahi, Manjit [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Vet Res Inst, Div Anim Genet, Cent Instrumentat Facil, Izatnagar 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] ICAR Indian Vet Res Inst, Swine Prod Farm, Bareilly 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] ICAR Indian Vet Res Inst, Div Biol Standardizat, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Native pig; E; coli; TFRC; ACK1; MAT; RFLP; qPCR; ENTEROTOXIGENIC ESCHERICHIA-COLI; INTESTINAL RECEPTOR; BRUSH-BORDERS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PIGLETS; PHENOTYPES; GENES; F4AC; CHROMOSOME-13; CHINESE;
D O I
10.1007/s13205-019-1956-5
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A total of 9 SNPs located in TFRC and ACK1 genes of SSC13q41 genomic region were examined for their association with the adhesion pattern of native Indian pigs using local isolate of diarrhoeagenic E. coli. Phenotypic evaluation of adhesion pattern of 150 pigs revealed 116 animals positive for adhesion, whereas 34 animals had non-adhesive phenotype. Among the adhesive animals, 6, 87 and 23 pigs were strongly adhesive, weakly adhesive and adhesive, respectively. PCR-RFLP study revealed 8 polymorphic SNPs with low to moderate PIC ranging from 7.39 to 37.25% and low to high heterozygosities (8-70%). The loci g.291 C > T, rs81218930 C > T, rs318751568 C > T of TFRC and g.93222 C > A g.94600 C > T of ACK1 showed significant departure from HWE. The genotypic frequencies of the SNPs as well as the haplotypes did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) across the adhesion patterns except one SNP (ACK1-g.107371 A > C). Among the g.107371 A > C genotypes observed, CA was associated with non-adhesive phenotype. Furthermore, TFRC mRNA expression levels were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) different among various adhesive phenotypes, whereas that of ACK1 was significantly (P < 0.05) different between non-adhesive and adhesive groups. The significant association of SNP (ACK1-g.107371 A > C), which was also previously reported to influence ETECF4 mediated diarrhoea susceptibility, implicates its wider application in genetic control of piglet diarrhoea. Furthermore, the up-regulation of TFRC gene expression in adhesive group supports its proposed role in activation of immune cells against E. coli and intracellular iron transport.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Distribution of K88 Escherichia coli adhesive and nonadhesive phenotypes among pigs of four breeds [J].
Baker, DR ;
Billey, LO ;
Francis, DH .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 54 (02) :123-132
[3]   DIFFERENT PIG PHENOTYPES AFFECT ADHERENCE OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI TO JEJUNAL BRUSH-BORDERS BY K88AB-ANTIGEN, K88AC-ANTIGEN, OR K88AD-ANTIGEN [J].
BIJLSMA, IGW ;
DENIJS, A ;
VANDERMEER, C ;
FRIK, JF .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1982, 37 (03) :891-894
[4]   Multiple receptors on porcine intestinal epithelial cells for the three variants of Escherichia coli K88 fimbrial adhesin [J].
Billey, LO ;
Erickson, AK ;
Francis, DH .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 59 (2-3) :203-212
[5]  
Chaora N, 2013, THESIS
[6]   Correlation between the methylation of the FUT1 promoter region and FUT1 expression in the duodenum of piglets from newborn to weaning [J].
Dai, Chaohui ;
Sun, Li ;
Xia, Riwei ;
Sun, Shouyong ;
Zhu, Guoqiang ;
Wu, Shenglong ;
Bao, Wenbin .
3 BIOTECH, 2017, 7
[7]   The MUC family:: an obituary [J].
Dekker, J ;
Rossen, JWA ;
Büller, HA ;
Einerhand, AWC .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 27 (03) :126-131
[8]   THE PORCINE INTESTINAL RECEPTOR FOR ESCHERICHIA-COLI K88-ALPHA-B, K88-ALPHA-C - REGIONAL LOCALIZATION ON CHROMOSOME-13 AND INFLUENCE OF IGG RESPONSE TO THE K88 ANTIGEN [J].
EDFORSLILJA, I ;
GUSTAFSSON, U ;
DUVALIFLAH, Y ;
ELLERGREN, H ;
JOHANSSON, M ;
JUNEJA, RK ;
MARKLUND, L ;
ANDERSSON, L .
ANIMAL GENETICS, 1995, 26 (04) :237-242
[9]  
Eliades NG., 2009, FOREST GENETICS FORE
[10]  
GUERIN G, 1993, ANIM GENET, V24, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1993.tb00347.x