Policy paradigms and cross-national policy (mis)learning from the Danish employment miracle

被引:16
作者
Larsen, CA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aalborg, Ctr Comparat Welf State Studies, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
active labour market policy; policy learning; policy paradigm; policy transfer; third way policy; unemployment;
D O I
10.1080/13501760210162320
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Denmark and the Netherlands are often cited as models of successful active labour market policies. This 'employment miracle' has been credited to the new active labour market policy which is seen as a possible model for other European countries. One could even say that 'activation policy' is seen as a 'third way' to overcome the difficult dilemma between equality and employment and has become a dominant policy fashion, spread by such agencies as the European Commission and the OECD. However, if we take a closer look at the evaluations of the actual effects of the activation policy, there is not much evidence to substantiate this interpretation. An alternative interpretation is that job miracles are much more a result of fortunate macro-economic conditions than successful supply side policy. Nevertheless, both national and international policy-makers seem entrapped in a policy paradigm of structural unemployment that intensifies and spreads questionable activation policies. In that respect 'activation policies' are an excellent case of the intensification of European policy transfer and the path-dependent 'bounded' rationality of policy-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 735
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN JG, 1995, LEDIGE RESSOURCER AN
[2]  
ANDERSEN JG, 1991, SKATTER UDEN VELFAER
[3]  
[Anonymous], STREET LEVEL BUREAUC
[4]  
[Anonymous], ILO EMPLOYMENT TRAIN
[5]  
*ARB, 1999, SURV EFF AKT DAGP
[6]  
*ARB, 1999, EFF IND AKT, VU
[7]  
AUER P, 2000, EMPLOYMENT REVIVAL E
[8]  
BACH HB, 1997, VIRKSOMHEDERNES ARBE, V2
[9]   DOES ACTIVE LABOR-MARKET POLICY INCREASE EMPLOYMENT - THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND SOME EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE FROM SWEDEN [J].
CALMFORS, L ;
SKEDINGER, P .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 1995, 11 (01) :91-109
[10]  
Calmfors L, 1994, OECD EC STUDIES, V22