Structural performance of large-scale concrete beams reinforced with cementitious composite containing different fibers

被引:17
作者
Ismail, Mohamed K. [1 ,2 ]
Hassan, Assem A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Civil Engn, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, St John, NF, Canada
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Struct Engn, Giza, Egypt
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Engineered cementitious composite; Fiber type; Large-scale beam; Flexural behavior; Repair; FLEXURAL BEHAVIOR; COLUMN JOINTS; RC BEAMS; ECC; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.028
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigated the structural behavior of large-scale normal concrete (NC) beams repaired with different fiber-reinforced cementitious composites (FRCC). To simulate the repair method, a specific layer of the NC beam was replaced by the FRCC in either the tension or compression zone. In this investigation, two types of FRCC were used, namely ECC and SFRCC, which were developed with same mixture composition but different fibers, i. e., polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers in ECC and steel fibers (SFs) in SFRCC. The behavior of the ECC, SFRCC and repaired beams was compared to control beam fully cast with NC. The investigated parameters included loaddeflection behavior, cracking and failure mode, first crack and ultimate load, ductility, and energy absorption capacity. The results indicated that the fully cast ECC and SFRCC beams showed a significantly improved flexural performance compared to the fully cast NC beam, especially with SFRCC. Repairing NC beam with ECC or SFRCC at the compression zone obviously contributed to improving the ultimate load, ductility, and energy absorption capacity compared to the fully cast NC beam. These improvements were more pronounced in beam repaired with SFRCC compared to ECC. Meanwhile, repairing the NC beam with ECC or SFRCC at the tension zone contributed to controlling the initiation and propagation of cracks, thus providing better durability performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1215
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ACI, 2008, BUILDING CODE REQUIR
[2]  
ACI (American Concrete Institute), 2001, CONTROL CRACKING CON
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ASTM C496:2017
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 8110 BS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ASTM C150C150M
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ASTM C39/C39M
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, C618 ASTM
[8]   Effect of compressive strength and tensile reinforcement ratio on flexural behavior of high-strength concrete beams [J].
Ashour, SA .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2000, 22 (05) :413-423
[9]  
Canadian Standards Association Committee A23.3, 2004, CSA A233 04
[10]  
CEB-FIP, 1992, CEB-FIP Model Code 1990