Cross-cultural differences in the acceptance of decisions of automated vehicles

被引:29
作者
Edelmann, Aaron [1 ,2 ]
Stuempe, Stefan [1 ]
Petzoldt, Tibor [2 ]
机构
[1] Audi AG, D-85045 Ingolstadt, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Chair Traff & Transportat Psychol, Hettnerstt 1, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Automated driving; Cross-culture; User acceptance; Decision-making; BEHAVIOR; DRIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103346
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Automated vehicles are expected to enhance driving safety and comfort. In order to fulfil these expectations, they have to be widely accepted and used. Implementing an acceptable driving style is therefore a must. Previous research on automated vehicle acceptance has largely concentrated on the effects of driving dynamics. This study takes a different approach and focuses on the effects of the driving decisions. To assess the effects of driving decisions on acceptance, an online experimental study was conducted in China, Germany, Japan and the US. Four overtaking scenarios, in which the automated vehicle took a decision, were presented as short texts. The situations differed with regard to the action (overtaking vs. stay in lane) and potential consequence (high or low hindrance of another driver). Participants then rated their acceptance. The results indicate that acceptance is dependent on the driving decisions and is further influenced by cultural background. Chinese drivers show high acceptance to the decisions and there were no significant differences between the presented scenarios. In the US and Germany, decisions leading to high hindrance of others are rejected, whereas in cases of low hindrance, overtaking is preferred. Japanese participants reject decisions, which lead to hindrance of others.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Abraham H., 2017, TRANSPORTATION RES B
[2]  
Adell E., 2014, Driver Acceptance of new technology. Theory, P11
[3]   Cultural foundations of safety culture: A comparison of traffic safety culture in China, Japan and the United States [J].
Atchley, Paul ;
Shi, Jing ;
Yamamoto, Toshiyuki .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2014, 26 :317-325
[4]   Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future [J].
Banks, Victoria A. ;
Stanton, Neville A. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 53 :389-395
[5]   Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective [J].
Bansal, Prateek ;
Kockelman, Kara M. ;
Singh, Amit .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 67 :1-14
[6]   Objective metrics of comfort: Developing a driving style for highly automated vehicles [J].
Bellem, Hanna ;
Schoenenberg, Thorben ;
Krems, Josef F. ;
Schrauf, Michael .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 41 :45-54
[7]   In the Passenger Seat: Investigating Ride Comfort Measures in Autonomous Cars [J].
Elbanhawi, Mohamed ;
Simic, Milan ;
Jazar, Reza .
IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2015, 7 (03) :4-17
[8]   Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations [J].
Fagnant, Daniel J. ;
Kockelman, Kara .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 77 :167-181
[9]   Learning Driver Behavior Models from Traffic Observations for Decision Making and Planning [J].
Gindele, Tobias ;
Brechtel, Sebastian ;
Dillmann, Ruediger .
IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2015, 7 (01) :69-79
[10]  
IEEE, 2012, NEWS RELEASE INTELLI