Developing an Engineering Design Process Assessment Using Think-Aloud Interviews

被引:0
作者
Alemdar, Meltem [1 ]
Lingle, Jeremy A. [1 ]
Wind, Stefanie A. [2 ]
Moore, Roxanne A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, CEISMC, Coll Sci, 817 West Peachtree St,Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Coll Educ, Box 870231, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
engineering design process; assessment; validation; cognitive interviews;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Early exposure to engineering has been found to help students in their decision-making regarding engineering education and career pathways. Subsequently, an NSF-funded project is underway that is focused on development of an engineering curriculum for students in grades six through nine. The Engineering Design Process (EDP) frames this curriculum. The current study presents the validation methods and results of a multiple-choice assessment created to measure students' understanding of the EDP. The utilization of Think Aloud Interviews and the application and analysis of qualitative coding schemes for the purpose of systematically gathering evidence about the psychometric quality of the assessment are described. Findings from this study support the validity of the EDP assessment through evidence of alignment between the intended skills and the skills elicited in the student interviews.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 452
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2006.00075.X]
[2]  
[Anonymous], J TECHNOLOGY LEARNIN
[3]  
Atman C.J., 2014, Handbook of Engineering Education Research, P201
[4]   Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners [J].
Atman, Cynthia J. ;
Adams, Robin S. ;
Cardella, Monica E. ;
Turns, Jennifer ;
Mosborg, Susan ;
Saleem, Jason .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (04) :359-379
[5]  
Bailey R, 2006, INT J ENG EDUC, V22, P508
[6]  
Carr R.L., 2012, Journal of Engineering Education, V101, P1
[7]  
DeBoer G.E., 2008, Coherent Science Education: Implications for Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy, P153
[8]   Validity: Meaning and Relevancy in Assessment for Engineering Education Research [J].
Douglas, Kerrie Anna ;
Purzer, Senay .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2015, 104 (02) :108-118
[9]  
Ercikan K., 2010, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V29, P24, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00173.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2010.00173.X]
[10]   VERBAL REPORTS AS DATA [J].
ERICSSON, KA ;
SIMON, HA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1980, 87 (03) :215-251