Integrating Location Models with Bayesian Analysis to Inform Decision Making

被引:19
|
作者
Xu, Jianhua [1 ]
Small, Mitchell [2 ,3 ]
Fischbeck, Paul [3 ,4 ]
VanBriesen, Jeanne [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Environm Management, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 10071, Peoples R China
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Bayesian analysis; Networks; Probe instruments; Water distribution systems; Decision making; DETECTING ACCIDENTAL CONTAMINATIONS; WATER DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS; SENSOR PLACEMENT; BELIEF NETWORKS; STATIONS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000026
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the present work, we locate sensors in water distribution networks and make inferences on the presence of contamination events based on sensor signals. We fully consider the imperfection of sensors, which means that sensors do provide false positive and false negative signals, and we propose a two-stage model by combining a facility location model with Bayesian networks to (1) identify optimal sensors locations and (2) infer the probability of the occurrence of a contamination event and the possible contamination source based on sensor signals, the probability of a contamination event being detected by the sensors given that there is a contamination event, and the probability of detecting a contamination event given that there is actually no such event (overall false positive rate). This two-stage model can also be used to construct the trade-offs between the number of sensors and the power (the false negative and false positive rates) of individual sensors while guaranteeing the performance (the probability of detecting random contamination events) of the sensor network system (all the sensors). The method can be generalized to address similar problems in deploying sensors in harsh environments.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 216
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Bayesian approach toward the use of qualitative information to inform on-farm decision making: The example of soil compaction
    Roberton, S. D.
    Lobsey, C. R.
    Bennett, J. McL
    GEODERMA, 2021, 382
  • [42] Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions
    Susan L. Norris
    Max T. Aung
    Nicholas Chartres
    Tracey J. Woodruff
    Environmental Health, 20
  • [43] INTEGRATING MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING MODELS INTO THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FRAMEWORK FOR MARKETING DECISIONS
    JAVALGI, RG
    JAIN, HK
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 1988, 35 (06) : 575 - 596
  • [44] Integrating salience and value in decision making
    Louie, Kenway
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (40) : 15853 - 15854
  • [45] Bayesian Decision Models: A Primer
    Ma, Wei Ji
    NEURON, 2019, 104 (01) : 164 - 175
  • [46] Integrating Categorization and Decision-Making
    Zheng, Rong
    Busemeyer, Jerome R.
    Nosofsky, Robert M.
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2023, 47 (01)
  • [47] Quantum Bayesian Decision-Making
    de Oliveira, Michael
    Barbosa, Luis Soares
    FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE, 2023, 28 (01) : 21 - 41
  • [48] Quantum Bayesian Decision-Making
    Michael de Oliveira
    Luis Soares Barbosa
    Foundations of Science, 2023, 28 : 21 - 41
  • [49] Advances in Bayesian decision making in reliability
    Insua, David Rios
    Ruggeri, Fabrizio
    Soyer, Refik
    Wilson, Simon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 282 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [50] Integrating decision modeling and machine learning to inform treatment stratification
    Glynn, David
    Giardina, John
    Hatamyar, Julia
    Pandya, Ankur
    Soares, Marta
    Kreif, Noemi
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024, 33 (08) : 1772 - 1792