The effect of frontoparietal paired associative stimulation on decision-making and working memory

被引:19
|
作者
Nord, Camilla L. [1 ,2 ]
Popa, Traian [3 ,4 ]
Smith, Emma [1 ]
Hannah, Ricci [5 ]
Donamayor, Nuria [1 ,6 ]
Weidacker, Kathrin [1 ]
Bays, Paul M. [7 ]
Rothwell, John [5 ]
Voon, Valerie [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Ctr Neuroprosthet, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] NINDS, NIH, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] UCL, Sobell Ctr Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, London, England
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Berlin, Germany
[7] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, England
[8] Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Fdn Trust, Cambridge, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Paired associative stimulation; Decision-making; Habitual; Goal-directed; Psychiatry; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CORTEX; PARIETAL; COMPULSIVITY; PLASTICITY; NETWORKS; PROTECTS; REWARDS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.015
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous single-site neurostimulation experiments have unsuccessfully attempted to shift decision-making away from habitual control, a fast, inflexible cognitive strategy, towards goal-directed control, a flexible, though computationally expensive strategy. We employed a dual-target neurostimulation approach in 30 healthy participants, using cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (ccPAS) to target two key nodes: lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), to test whether decision-making can be artificially shifted from habitual toward goal-directed control. Participants received three active stimulations, delivered at least six days apart (each involving 100 paired pulses over the IPS and LPFC, varying the interstimulus interval): two interventional, time-relevant ccPAS (10 msec interval) and one control, non-time-relevant ccPAS (100 msec interval). Following stimulation, participants completed a sequential learning task, measuring goal-directed/habitual control, and a working memory task. IPS -> LPFC ccPAS (stimulating IPS, then LPFC with a 10 msec interval) shifted decision-making from habitual toward goal-directed control, compared to control ccPAS. There was no effect of LPFC -> IPS ccPAS, nor an effect of any PAS condition on working memory. Previous studies have shown ccPAS effects outside the motor domain targeting prefrontal regions on response inhibition, attentional bias, and alpha asymmetry. The present study measures the behavioural effects of parietal-prefrontal PAS, focusing on a highly complex decision-making task and working memory. If confirmed in larger studies, this would be the first instance of neurostimulation successfully shifting decision-making from habitual to goal-directed control, putatively via inducing long-term potentiation between the IPS and LPFC. However, we found no effect in the other direction (LPFC -> ccPAS), and no effect on working memory overall. PAS is a relatively new neuromodulatory technique in the cognitive arsenal, and this study could help guide future approaches in healthy and disordered decision-making. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 276
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on decision-making
    Martin, CO
    Denburg, NL
    Tranel, D
    Granner, MA
    Bechara, A
    CORTEX, 2004, 40 (4-5) : 605 - 612
  • [22] The Effect of Paired Associative Stimulation on the Speed-Strength Parameters of Human Voluntary Movement
    Ivanov, S. M.
    Shlyakhtov, V. N.
    Gorodnichev, R. M.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 60 (06) : 2547 - 2556
  • [23] The effect of breaking up prolonged sitting on paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity
    E. Bojsen-Møller
    M. M. Ekblom
    O. Tarassova
    D. W. Dunstan
    O. Ekblom
    Experimental Brain Research, 2020, 238 : 2497 - 2506
  • [24] The Effect of Movement Phase on the Contralaterally Coordinated Paired Associative Stimulation-Induced Excitability
    Alokaily, Ahmad O.
    Yarossi, Mathew
    Fluet, Gerard G.
    Tunik, Eugene
    Adamovich, Sergei, V
    2018 40TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2018, : 3080 - 3083
  • [25] Attentional Filter Training but Not Memory Training Improves Decision-Making
    Schmicker, Marlen
    Muller, Patrick
    Schwefel, Melanie
    Muller, Notger G.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11
  • [26] The relation between memory and decision-making in multiple sclerosis patients
    Hoffmann, Janina A.
    Bareuther, Lena
    Schmidt, Roger
    Dettmers, Christian
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2020, 37
  • [27] A Survey to Determine Decision-Making Styles of Working Paramedics and Student Paramedics
    Jensen, J. L.
    Bienkowski, A.
    Travers, A. H.
    Calder, L. A.
    Walker, M.
    Tavares, W.
    Croskerry, P.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (03) : 213 - 222
  • [28] The Use of Cognitive Paired Associative Stimulation (C-PAS) in Investigating and Remediating the Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Working Memory in Humans: The Importance of State-Dependency
    Luber, Bruce
    Ekpo, Ekaete C.
    Lisanby, Sarah H.
    CURRENT SLEEP MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 10 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [29] Strategy-dependent effects of working-memory limitations on human perceptual decision-making
    Schapiro, Kyra
    Josic, Kresimir
    Kilpatrick, Zachary P.
    Gold, Joshua, I
    ELIFE, 2022, 11
  • [30] Decision-Making Rules and the Influence of Memory Data
    Beran, Vaclav
    Teichmann, Marek
    Kuda, Frantisek
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 18