共 50 条
Risk Factors for Clinical Coronary Heart Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Lupus and Atherosclerosis Evaluation of Risk (LASER) Study
被引:73
|作者:
Haque, Sahena
Gordon, Caroline
[4
]
Isenberg, David
Rahman, Anisur
Lanyon, Peter
Bell, Aubrey
Emery, Paul
McHugh, Neil
[5
]
Teh, Lee Suan
Scott, David G. I.
[6
]
Akil, Mohamed
Naz, Sophia
Andrews, Jacqueline
Griffiths, Bridget
Harris, Helen
Youssef, Hazem
McLaren, John
Toescu, Veronica
Devakumar, Vinodh
Teir, Jamal
Bruce, Ian N.
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Translat Med, Arc Epidemiol Unit, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
[2] Cent Manchester Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Kellgren Ctr Rheumatol, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Manchester Childrens Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Kellgren Ctr Rheumatol, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Div Immun & Infect, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[5] Royal Natl Hosp Rheumat Dis, Bath BA1 1RL, Avon, England
[6] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词:
SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS;
RISK FACTORS;
CORONARY HEART DISEASE;
DISEASE ACTIVITY;
ACCELERATED ATHEROSCLEROSIS;
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION;
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE;
PREVALENCE;
STROKE;
COHORT;
OUTCOMES;
DAMAGE;
HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA;
PREVENTION;
D O I:
10.3899/jrheum.090306
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objective. Accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease (CHD) arc recognized complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). but the exact etiology remains unclear and is likely, to be multifactorial. We hypothesized that SLE patients with CHD have increased exposure to traditional risk factors as well its differing disease phenotype and therapy-related factors compared to SLE patients free of CHD. Our aim was to examine risk factors for development of clinical CHD in SLE in the clinical setting. Methods. In a UK-wide multicenter retrospective case-control study we recruited 53 SLE patients with verified clinical CHD (myocardial infarction or angina pectoris) and 96 SLE patients without clinical CHD. Controls were recruited from the same center as the case and matched by disease duration. Charts were reviewed up to time of event for cases, or the same "dummy-date" in controls. Results. SLE patients with clinical CHD were older at the time of event [mean (SD) 53 (10) vs 42 (10) yrs: p < 0.001], more likely to be male [11 (20%) vs 3 (7%): p < 0.001], and had more exposure to all classic CHD risk factors compared to SLE patients without clinical CHD. The), were also more likely to have been treated with corticosteroids (OR 2.46: 95% CI 1.03, 5.88) and azathioprine (OR 2.33: 95% CI 1.16, 4.67) and to have evidence of damage on the pre-event SLICC damage index (SDI) (OR 2.20: 95% CI 1.09, 4.44). There was no difference between groups with regard to clinical or-an involvement or autoantibody profile. Conclusion. Our study highlights the need for clinical vigilance to identify modifiable risk factors in the clinical setting and in particular with male patients. The pattern of organ involvement did not differ in SLE patients with CHD events. However. the higher pi-c-event SDI, azathioprine exposure, and pattern of damage items (disease-related rather than therapy-related) in cases suggests that a persistent active lupus phenotype contributes to CHD risk. In this regard. corticosteroids and azathioprine may not control disease well enough to prevent CHD. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether classic risk factor modification will have a role in primary prevention of CHD in SLE patients and whether new therapies that control disease activity can better reduce CHD risk. (First Release Dec 1 2009: J Rheumatol 2010:37:322-9; doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090306)
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 329
页数:8
相关论文