Flood precaution of companies and their ability to cope with the flood in August 2002 in Saxony, Germany

被引:76
作者
Kreibich, Heidi
Mueller, Meike
Thieken, Annegret H.
Merz, Bruno
机构
[1] Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Deutsch Ruckversicherung AG, D-40549 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005WR004691
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The German federal state of Saxony was the most affected region during the severe flood in August 2002, and damage to companies was high. A survey of 415 companies representing a variety of sectors and sizes was undertaken to identify deficits in the flood management of companies. In August 2002, preparedness and precaution of companies was low. Additionally, 45% of the companies had not received any flood warning. Consequently, many companies were unable to perform emergency measures successfully. The mean total damage to companies amounted to 1.1 million euros. However, because of relatively good flood compensation, recovery advanced quickly. After the flood, preparedness and precaution increased, but there is still significant potential for more precautionary measures. The flood warning system should be further improved. Specific incentive and communication programs should be developed for the service and financial sectors, where preparedness and precaution is weakest, as well as for the manufacturing sector, which has the highest damage potential.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Fate of facultative pathogenic microorganisms during and after the flood of the Elbe and Mulde rivers in August 2002
    Abraham, WR
    Wenderoth, DF
    ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA, 2005, 33 (05): : 449 - 454
  • [32] Coping with floods:: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002
    Thieken, Annegret H.
    Kreibich, Heidi
    Mueller, Meike
    Merz, Bruno
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2007, 52 (05): : 1016 - 1037
  • [33] Das Katastrophenhochwasser vom 7. August 2002 am Kamp — Eine erste EinschätzungThe August 7, 2002 — Flood of the Kamp — A first assessment
    D. Gutknecht
    Ch. Reszler
    G. Blöschl
    e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 2002, 119 (12) : 411 - 413
  • [34] Plant and soil contamination with trace metals in the Elbe floodplains:: A case study after the flood in August 2002
    Gröngröft, A
    Krüger, F
    Grunewald, K
    Meissner, R
    Miehlich, G
    ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA, 2005, 33 (05): : 466 - 474
  • [35] Sources of water vapour contributing to the Elbe flood in August 2002-A tagging study in a mesoscale model
    Sodemann, H.
    Wernli, H.
    Schwierz, C.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 135 (638) : 205 - 223
  • [36] Letter from Dresden (Impact of the August 2002 torrential rains and flood waters on the city and Semper Oper)
    Norton-Welsh, C
    OPERA NEWS, 2002, 67 (06): : 10 - 11
  • [37] Einfluss des Hochwassers 2002 auf die Grundwasser-Beschaffenheit in DresdenInfluence of the flood 2002 on groundwater chemistry in Dresden, Germany
    Dirk Marre
    Wolfgang Walther
    Kirsten Ullrich
    Grundwasser, 2005, 10 (3) : 146 - 156
  • [38] Short contribution on adaptive behaviour of flood-prone companies: A pilot study ofDresden-Laubegast, Germany
    Jehmlich, Caroline
    Hudson, Paul
    Thieken, Annegret H.
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (04):
  • [39] Rainfall Space-Time Organization and Orographic Control on Flash Flood Response: The Weisseritz Event of August 13, 2002
    Tarolli, Michele
    Borga, Marco
    Zoccatelli, Davide
    Bernhofer, Christian
    Jatho, Nadine
    al Janabi, Firas
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (02) : 183 - 193
  • [40] The dynamics of vulnerability: some preliminary thoughts about the occurrence of ‘radical surprises’ and a case study on the 2002 flood (Germany)
    Christian Kuhlicke
    Natural Hazards, 2010, 55 : 671 - 688