Flood precaution of companies and their ability to cope with the flood in August 2002 in Saxony, Germany

被引:76
|
作者
Kreibich, Heidi
Mueller, Meike
Thieken, Annegret H.
Merz, Bruno
机构
[1] Geoforschungszentrum Potsdam, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Deutsch Ruckversicherung AG, D-40549 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005WR004691
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The German federal state of Saxony was the most affected region during the severe flood in August 2002, and damage to companies was high. A survey of 415 companies representing a variety of sectors and sizes was undertaken to identify deficits in the flood management of companies. In August 2002, preparedness and precaution of companies was low. Additionally, 45% of the companies had not received any flood warning. Consequently, many companies were unable to perform emergency measures successfully. The mean total damage to companies amounted to 1.1 million euros. However, because of relatively good flood compensation, recovery advanced quickly. After the flood, preparedness and precaution increased, but there is still significant potential for more precautionary measures. The flood warning system should be further improved. Specific incentive and communication programs should be developed for the service and financial sectors, where preparedness and precaution is weakest, as well as for the manufacturing sector, which has the highest damage potential.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] August 2002 catastrophic flood in the Czech Republic
    Boucek, Jan
    Extreme Hydrological Events: New Concepts for Security, 2007, 78 : 59 - 68
  • [12] Analysis of the flood events in August 2002 - FloodRisk
    Habersack H.
    Stiefelmeyer H.
    Petrascheck A.
    Bürgel J.
    Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 2005, 57 (5-6) : 88 - 94
  • [13] Trends in Flood Hazard in Germany (1951 to 2002) and Consequences for Flood Design
    Petrow, Theresia
    Delgado, Jose Miguel Martins
    Merz, Bruno
    WASSERWIRTSCHAFT, 2008, 98 (11) : 24 - 28
  • [14] Assessment of flood loss model transferability considering changes in precaution of flood-affected residents in Germany
    Kienzler, Sarah
    Kreibich, Heidi
    Mueller, Meike
    Pech, Ina
    Thieken, Annegret H.
    3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FLOODRISK 2016), 2016, 7
  • [15] Drinking water situation ding the 2002 flood in Dobeln/Saxony
    Partisch, M
    Bigl, S
    Keilig, V
    Steinborn, H
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2003, 65 (05) : A14 - A14
  • [16] Flood damage and influencing factors:: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany -: art. no. W12430
    Thieken, AH
    Müller, M
    Kreibich, H
    Merz, B
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2005, 41 (12) : 1 - 16
  • [17] The elbe flood in August 2002 - Organic contaminants in sediments samples taken after the flood event
    Stachel, Burkhard
    Jantzen, Eckard
    Knoth, Wilhelm
    Krüger, Frank
    Lepom, Peter
    Oetken, Matthias
    Reincke, Heinrich
    Sawal, Georg
    Schwartz, René
    Uhlig, Steffen
    Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 2005, 40 (02): : 265 - 287
  • [18] The Elbe flood in August 2002 -: Organic contaminants in sediment samples taken after the flood event
    Stachel, B
    Jantzen, E
    Knoth, W
    Krüger, F
    Lepom, P
    Oetken, M
    Reincke, H
    Sawal, G
    Schwartz, R
    Uhlig, S
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 40 (02): : 265 - 287
  • [19] Displacement of pollutants during the river Elbe flood in August 2002
    Ockenfeld, K
    Böhme, M
    Knöchel, A
    Geller, W
    ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA, 2005, 33 (05): : 391 - 394
  • [20] Radionuclides in the Mulde river system after the August-2002 flood
    Michel, R
    Feuerborn, J
    Knöchel, A
    Miller, F
    Ritzel, S
    Treutler, HC
    von Tümpling, W
    Sanke, C
    ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA, 2005, 33 (05): : 492 - 506