Ovarian Cancer Markers of Response

被引:14
|
作者
Na, Young-Jeong [1 ,2 ]
Farley, John [3 ]
Zeh, Audrey [2 ]
del Carmen, Marcela [2 ]
Penson, Richard [2 ]
Birrer, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, Comprehens Gynecol Canc Ctr, Bundang CHA Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Gyunggido, South Korea
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Gillette Ctr Gynecol Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
Ovarian; Malignancies; Markers; Response; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; GENE-EXPRESSION; ADVANCED-STAGE; GROWTH-FACTOR; P53; OVEREXPRESSION; GENOMIC SIGNATURES; BINDING-PROTEINS; MUCINOUS TUMORS; SURVIVAL; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181c2aeb5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Despite improved knowledge regarding the etiology of ovarian cancer, as well as application of aggressive surgery and chemotherapy, there has been only a modest change in the mortality statistics over the last 30 years. Given these results and the evolution of targeted therapies, there is an increasing need for prognostic and predictive factors to stratify patients for individualized care. Many laboratories have also investigated the specific individual biomarkers correlating them with clinicopathologic characteristics. Unfortunately, the vast majorities of these biomarkers have not proved clinically valuable. In this article, we review published genomic signatures including data generated in Our laboratory for their relevance. Methods: Multiple published expression profiling articles were selected for review and discussion. Genomic Studies were separated from those with dichotomized Survival data and unsupervised analysis to identify discreet subsets of tumors and Studies that generated activated pathways. Results: The identification of prognostic and predictive individual biomarkers has been common. Few of these have been validated. Genomic profiles have been obtained that distinguish short- from long-term survivors. The relevance of these studies to the large number of patients within the extremes remains unclear. Unsupervised Clustering Studies of ovarian cancers have identified potential subsets of tumors that reflect different clinical behavior. These Studies will require large numbers of independent samples for validation. Another approach has been to identify genes that correlate with patient Survival as a continuous variable. These genes are then placed into biologic context using pathway analysis. These pathways provide potential therapeutic targets, and those patients whose tumors express these targets may be most effectively treated by using inhibitors specific for the pathway. Conclusions: There is a major need for prognostic and predictive biomarkers for ovarian cancer. With the development of new genomic technologies, there is ail Opportunity to identify gene expression signatures that can be used to stratify patients according to their ultimate survival and response to chemotherapy. Large independent sets and robust statistical techniques will be required to fully exploit this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:S21 / S29
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Angiogenesis markers in ovarian cancer act as prognostic markers but not indicators of chemotherapy response
    O'Toole, S
    Sheppard, BL
    O'Leary, JJ
    Sheils, O
    D'arcy, T
    Gleeson, N
    McGuinness, E
    Laois, A
    Bonnar, J
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2005, 207 : 1 - 1
  • [2] Changes in DNA Damage Response Markers with Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Kubelac, Paul
    Genestie, Catherine
    Auguste, Aurelie
    Mesnage, Soizick
    Le Formal, Audrey
    Pautier, Patricia
    Gouy, Sebastien
    Morice, Philippe
    Bentivegna, Enrica
    Maulard, Amandine
    Adam, Julien
    Achimas-Cadariu, Patriciu
    Leary, Alexandra
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [3] Changes in DNA damage response markers with treatment in advanced ovarian cancer
    Kubelac, P.
    Auguste, A.
    Genestie, C.
    Mesnage, S.
    Le Formal, A.
    Achimas-Cadariu, P.
    Leary, A.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 164 - 165
  • [4] Discriminating Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Ovarian Cancer: Focus on Systemic Inflammatory Response Markers
    Yegin, Gulin Feykan
    Tas, Emre Erdem
    Kilic, Gokhan
    Keskin, Huseyin Levent
    Yavuz, Ayse Filiz
    CYPRUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 5 (01): : 36 - 40
  • [5] Markers of angiogenesis in ovarian cancer
    Merritt, William M.
    Sood, Anil K.
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2007, 23 (5-6) : 419 - 431
  • [6] Epigenetic markers of ovarian cancer
    Barton, Caroline A.
    Clark, Susan J.
    Hacker, Neville F.
    O'Brien, Philippa M.
    OVARIAN CANCER: STATE OF THE ART AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 622 : 35 - 51
  • [7] Tumor Markers in ovarian cancer
    Duffy, Michael J.
    Esteva, Francisco J.
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Molina, Rafael
    ACTA BIOQUIMICA CLINICA LATINOAMERICANA, 2014, 48 (01): : 88 - 106
  • [8] Tumour markers in ovarian cancer
    Kehoe, S
    Selman, T
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2001, 62 (08): : 452 - 453
  • [9] Diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer
    Vassileva V.
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2009, 6 (12) : 678 - 678
  • [10] Tumor markers in ovarian cancer
    Raspollini, M. R.
    Taddei, G. L.
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI OSTETRICIA E GINECOLOGIA, 2007, 29 (8-9): : 295 - 302