The inclination for conscious motor control after stroke: validating the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale for use in inpatient stroke patients

被引:19
作者
Kal, E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Houdijk, H. [1 ,3 ]
Van Der Wurff, P. [4 ]
Groet, E. [1 ]
Van Bennekom, C. [1 ,5 ]
Scherder, E. [2 ]
Van der Kamp, J. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Heliomare Rehabil Ctr, Dept Res & Dev, Relweg 51, NL-1949 EC Wijk Aan Zee, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, William James Grad Sch, Fac Psychol & Educ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Res Inst Move, Fac Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Mil Rehabil Ctr Aardenburg, Doorn, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Coronel Inst Occupat & Environm Hlth, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Hong Kong, Inst Human Performance, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
reinvestment; motor control; physical therapy; rehabilitation; patient-reported outcome measure; stroke; CVA; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT; ATTENTIONAL FOCUS; FIT INDEXES; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3109/09638288.2015.1091858
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: Stroke survivors are inclined to consciously control their movements, a phenomenon termed "reinvestment". Preliminary evidence suggests reinvestment to impair patients' motor recovery. To investigate this hypothesis, an instrument is needed that can reliably assess reinvestment post-stroke. Therefore, this study aimed to validate the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS) within inpatient stroke patients. Method: One-hundred inpatient stroke patients (<1 year post-stroke) and 100 healthy peers completed the MSRS, which was translated to Dutch for the study purpose. To assess structural validity, confirmatory factor analysis determined whether the scale measures two latent constructs, as previously reported in healthy adults. Construct validity was determined by testing whether patients had higher reinvestment than controls. Reliability analyses entailed assessment of retest reliability (ICC), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and minimal detectable change. Results: Both structural and construct validity of the MSRS were supported. Retest reliability and internal consistency indices were acceptable to good. The minimal detectable change was adequate on group level, but considerable on individual level. Conclusions: The MSRS is a valid and reliable tool and suitable to assess the relationship between reinvestment and motor recovery in the first months post-stroke. Eventually, this may help therapists to individualize motor learning interventions based on patients' reinvestment preferences. Implications for rehabilitation This study showed that the Movement-Specific Reinvestment Scale (MSRS) is a valid and reliable tool to objectify stroke patients' inclination for conscious motor control. The MSRS may be used to identify stroke patients who are strongly inclined to consciously control their movements, as this disposition may hinder their motor recovery. Eventually, the MSRS may enable clinicians to tailor motor learning interventions to stroke patients' motor control preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1106
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条