Physiology-based electrocardiographic criteria for left bundle branch capture

被引:127
作者
Jastrzebski, Marek [1 ]
Kiebasa, Grzegorz [1 ]
Curila, Karol [2 ,3 ]
Moskal, Pawe [1 ]
Bednarek, Agnieszka [1 ]
Rajzer, Marek [1 ]
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi [4 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Cardiol 1, Med Coll, Intervent Electrocardiol & Hypertens, Krakow, Poland
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 3, Dept Cardiol, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Hosp Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Geisinger Commonwealth Sch Med, Geisinger Heart Inst, Wilkes Barre, PA USA
关键词
Electrocardiographic criteria; Left bundle branch pacing; Left ventricular activation time; Physiological pacing; R-wave peak time;
D O I
10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.02.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND During left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, it is important to confirm that capture of the LBB, and not just capture of only adjacent left ventricular (LV) myocardium, has been achieved. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to establish electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for LBB capture. We hypothesized that because LBB pacing results in physiological depolarization of the LV, then the native QRS can serve as a reference for diagnosis of LBB capture in the same patient. METHODS Only patients with evidence of LBB capture (QRS morphology transition) were included. Several QRS characteristics were compared between the native rhythm and different types of LBB area capture. RESULTS A total of 357 ECGs (124 patients) were analyzed: 118 with native rhythm, 124 with nonselective LBB capture, 69 with selective LBB capture, and 46 with LV septal capture. Our hypotheses that during LBB capture the paced V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT; measured from QRS onset) equals the native V6 RWPT and that the paced V6 RWPT (measured from the stimulus) equals the LBB potential to V6 R-wave peak interval were positively validated. Criteria based on these rules had sensitivity and specificity of 88.2%-98.0% and 85.7%-95.4%, respectively. Moreover, 100% specific V6 RWPT cutoff for LBB capture diagnosis in patients with narrow QRS/right bundle branch block was determined to be 74 ms. CONCLUSION We showed equivalency of LV activation times on ECG during native and paced LBB conduction. Therefore, if V6 RWPT is longer during pacing, this finding is indicative of lack of LBB capture.
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 943
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing
    Huang, Weijian
    Chen, Xueying
    Su, Lan
    Wu, Shengjie
    Xia, Xue
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) : 1791 - 1796
  • [2] Fixation beats: A novel marker for reaching the left bundle branch area during deep septal lead implantation
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Kiebasa, Grzegorz
    Moskal, Pawe
    Bednarek, Agnieszka
    Kusiak, Aleksander
    Sondej, Tomasz
    Bednarski, Adam
    Rajzer, Marek
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2021, 18 (04) : 562 - 569
  • [3] Programmed deep septal stimulation: A novel maneuver for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture during permanent pacing
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Moskal, Pawel
    Bednarek, Agnieszka
    Kielbasa, Grzegorz
    Kusiak, Aleksander
    Sondej, Tomasz
    Bednarski, Adam
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Czarnecka, Danuta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (02) : 485 - 493
  • [4] Electrocardiographic characterization of non-selective His-bundle pacing: validation of novel diagnostic criteria
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    Moskal, Pawel
    Curila, Karol
    Fijorek, Kamil
    Kukla, Piotr
    Bednarek, Agnieszka
    Kielbasa, Grzegorz
    Bednarski, Adam
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    Czarnecka, Danuta
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (12): : 1857 - 1864
  • [5] R-Peak Time: An Electrocardiographic Parameter with Multiple Clinical Applications
    Perez-Riera, Andres Ricardo
    de Abreu, Luiz Carlos
    Barbosa-Barros, Raimundo
    Nikus, Kjell C.
    Baranchuk, Adrian
    [J]. ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2016, 21 (01) : 10 - 19
  • [6] Left bundle branch pacing: A comprehensive review
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Arora, Vanita
    Namboodiri, Narayanan
    Kumar, Vivek
    Kapoor, Aditya
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (09) : 2462 - 2473
  • [7] Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Ponnusamy, ShunmugaSundaram
    Cano, Oscar
    Sharma, Parikshit S.
    Naperkowski, Angela
    Subsposh, Faiz A.
    Moskal, Pawel
    Bednarek, Agnieszka
    Dal Forno, Alexander R.
    Young, Wilson
    Nanda, Sudip
    Beer, Dominik
    Herweg, Bengt
    Jastrzebski, Marek
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (02) : 135 - 147
  • [8] Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    Naperkowski, Angela
    Panikkath, Ragesh
    John, Kaitlyn
    Mascarenhas, Vernon
    Bauch, Terry D.
    Huang, Weijian
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) : 1774 - 1782
  • [9] Simplifying Physiological Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using a New Nine-Partition Method
    Zhang, Junmeng
    Wang, Zefeng
    Zu, Linna
    Cheng, Liting
    Su, Ruijuan
    Wang, Xinlu
    Liang, Zhuo
    Chen, Jieruo
    Hang, Fei
    Du, Jie
    Huang, Weijian
    Wu, Yongquan
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 37 (02) : 329 - 338