An evaluation of Landsat, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1 and MODIS data for crop type mapping

被引:83
|
作者
Song, Xiao-Peng [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Wenli [2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Matthew C. [2 ]
Potapov, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Geosci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD USA
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENCE OF REMOTE SENSING | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
Crop classification; Soybean; Corn; Optical data; Synthetic aperture radar;
D O I
10.1016/j.srs.2021.100018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Generating crop type maps using satellite remote sensing requires robust data acquisition at both high spatial and temporal resolutions to resolve rapid phenological transition at the field scale. The increasing availability of freely-available, moderate-resolution satellite data such as the Landsat and Sentinel series of satellites offers an unprecedent opportunity for large-area crop type mapping. In this study, we evaluated the utility of Landsat (7&8), Sentinel-2 (A&B), Sentinel-1 (A&B) and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for mapping corn and soybean in the United States. We designed a series of classification experiments using these satellite data over a nationally distributed sample as input and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cropland Data Layer (CDL) as reference for training and accuracy assessment. A set of tests were performed with data from each satellite senor as input to derive the potential accuracy achievable by the satellite/ sensor. In comparison, another set of tests were conducted with all data from all sensors as input to derive the combined accuracy as well as to evaluate the utility of each sensor, spectral band and acquisition date. Results showed that data from one satellite/sensor, either Landsat, Sentinel-2 or Sentinel-1, could achieve 94.8-96.8% accuracy, whereas the coarse-resolution MODIS produced about 92% accuracy, for both corn and soybean. Combing data from all sensors marginally improved the accuracy to 97.0% for both crops. Based on the criterion of deviation reduction in decision tree models, Landsat was identified as the most useful satellite/sensor for soybean classification, especially the two short-wave infrared bands, whereas Sentinel-2 was recognized as the most valuable satellite/sensor for corn classification, especially the red edge, near infrared and short-wave infrared bands. Optical data were always chosen over Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data by the pixel-based supervised classification algorithm except in some persistently cloudy regions, although using SAR data alone can also achieve very high accuracy. The virtual constellation of Landsat and Sentinel-2 increased data revisit frequency to 4-7 days in the U.S. during June to September 2017. However, cloud and shadow reduced clear-view observations by half. Satellite data acquisitions in July were most critical for mapping corn whereas data in July and August were most important for mapping soybean. Our analysis suggested that, without the practical limitation of training data, current freely-available, moderate-resolution satellite data including Landsat, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1 and MODIS, can achieve a potential accuracy of over 95% for national-scale crop type mapping over large industrial agricultural regions such as the United States. Expanding the spatial coverage and maintaining consistent acquisitions of Sentinel-1 data is a high priority to enable operational crop mapping and monitoring over large areas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On water surface delineation in rivers using Landsat-8, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data
    Possa, Evelyn M.
    Maillard, Philippe
    Gomes, Marilia F.
    Marques Ferreira, Igor Silva
    Leao, Guilherme de Oliveira
    REMOTE SENSING FOR AGRICULTURE, ECOSYSTEMS, AND HYDROLOGY XX, 2018, 10783
  • [22] An improved fusion of Landsat-7/8, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-1 data for monitoring alfalfa: Implications for crop remote sensing
    Chen, Jiang
    Zhang, Zhou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2023, 124
  • [23] Mapping sugarcane plantation dynamics in Guangxi, China, by time series Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat images
    Wang, Jie
    Xiao, Xiangming
    Liu, Luo
    Wu, Xiaocui
    Qin, Yuanwei
    Steiner, Jean L.
    Dong, Jinwei
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 247
  • [24] Mapping Crop Types of Germany by Combining Temporal Statistical Metrics of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Time Series with LPIS Data
    Asam, Sarah
    Gessner, Ursula
    Gonzalez, Roger Almengor
    Wenzl, Martina
    Kriese, Jennifer
    Kuenzer, Claudia
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [25] Irrigation Mapping on Two Contrasted Climatic Contexts Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data
    Elwan, Ehsan
    Le Page, Michel
    Jarlan, Lionel
    Baghdadi, Nicolas
    Brocca, Luca
    Modanesi, Sara
    Dari, Jacopo
    Quintana Segui, Pere
    Zribi, Mehrez
    WATER, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [26] Synergetic Use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data for Soil Moisture Mapping at Plot Scale
    Attarzadeh, Reza
    Amini, Jalal
    Notarnicola, Claudia
    Greifeneder, Felix
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [27] Deep Forest classifier for wetland mapping using the combination of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data
    Jamali, Ali
    Mahdianpari, Masoud
    Brisco, Brian
    Granger, Jean
    Mohammadimanesh, Fariba
    Salehi, Bahram
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 58 (07) : 1072 - 1089
  • [28] Mapping dead understorey Buxus hyrcana Pojark using Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-1 data
    Saba, Fatemeh
    Latifi, Hooman
    Zoej, Mohammad Javad Valadan
    Esmaili, Rohollah
    FORESTRY, 2023, 96 (02): : 228 - 248
  • [29] Synergistic use of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Landsat 8 in predicting forest variables
    Fang, Gengsheng
    Xu, Hao
    Yang, Sheng-, I
    Lou, Xiongwei
    Fang, Luming
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 151
  • [30] Fusing Landsat-8, Sentinel-1, and Sentinel-2 Data for River Water Mapping Using Multidimensional Weighted Fusion Method
    Liu, Qihang
    Zhang, Shiqiang
    Wang, Ninglian
    Ming, Yisen
    Huang, Chang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60