An evaluation of Landsat, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1 and MODIS data for crop type mapping

被引:87
作者
Song, Xiao-Peng [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Wenli [2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Matthew C. [2 ]
Potapov, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Geosci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD USA
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENCE OF REMOTE SENSING | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
Crop classification; Soybean; Corn; Optical data; Synthetic aperture radar;
D O I
10.1016/j.srs.2021.100018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Generating crop type maps using satellite remote sensing requires robust data acquisition at both high spatial and temporal resolutions to resolve rapid phenological transition at the field scale. The increasing availability of freely-available, moderate-resolution satellite data such as the Landsat and Sentinel series of satellites offers an unprecedent opportunity for large-area crop type mapping. In this study, we evaluated the utility of Landsat (7&8), Sentinel-2 (A&B), Sentinel-1 (A&B) and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) for mapping corn and soybean in the United States. We designed a series of classification experiments using these satellite data over a nationally distributed sample as input and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cropland Data Layer (CDL) as reference for training and accuracy assessment. A set of tests were performed with data from each satellite senor as input to derive the potential accuracy achievable by the satellite/ sensor. In comparison, another set of tests were conducted with all data from all sensors as input to derive the combined accuracy as well as to evaluate the utility of each sensor, spectral band and acquisition date. Results showed that data from one satellite/sensor, either Landsat, Sentinel-2 or Sentinel-1, could achieve 94.8-96.8% accuracy, whereas the coarse-resolution MODIS produced about 92% accuracy, for both corn and soybean. Combing data from all sensors marginally improved the accuracy to 97.0% for both crops. Based on the criterion of deviation reduction in decision tree models, Landsat was identified as the most useful satellite/sensor for soybean classification, especially the two short-wave infrared bands, whereas Sentinel-2 was recognized as the most valuable satellite/sensor for corn classification, especially the red edge, near infrared and short-wave infrared bands. Optical data were always chosen over Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data by the pixel-based supervised classification algorithm except in some persistently cloudy regions, although using SAR data alone can also achieve very high accuracy. The virtual constellation of Landsat and Sentinel-2 increased data revisit frequency to 4-7 days in the U.S. during June to September 2017. However, cloud and shadow reduced clear-view observations by half. Satellite data acquisitions in July were most critical for mapping corn whereas data in July and August were most important for mapping soybean. Our analysis suggested that, without the practical limitation of training data, current freely-available, moderate-resolution satellite data including Landsat, Sentinel-2, Sentinel-1 and MODIS, can achieve a potential accuracy of over 95% for national-scale crop type mapping over large industrial agricultural regions such as the United States. Expanding the spatial coverage and maintaining consistent acquisitions of Sentinel-1 data is a high priority to enable operational crop mapping and monitoring over large areas.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Crop Type and Land Cover Mapping in Northern Malawi Using the Integration of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and PlanetScope Satellite Data
    Kpienbaareh, Daniel
    Sun, Xiaoxuan
    Wang, Jinfei
    Luginaah, Isaac
    Bezner Kerr, Rachel
    Lupafya, Esther
    Dakishoni, Laifolo
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 21
  • [2] An Application of Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and GNSS Data for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
    Didehban, Khalil
    Rasouli, Hamid
    Kamran, Khalil Valizadeh
    Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar
    Blaschke, Thomas
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (10)
  • [3] CROP-IDENTIFICATION USING SENTINEL-1 AND SENTINEL-2 DATA FOR INDIAN REGION
    Singh, Jitendra
    Devi, Umamaheswari
    Hazra, Jagabondhu
    Kalyanaraman, Shivkumar
    [J]. IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 5312 - 5314
  • [4] Fast Urban Land Cover Mapping Exploiting Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data
    Petrushevsky, Naomi
    Manzoni, Marco
    Monti-Guarnieri, Andrea
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [5] Mapping sugarcane plantation dynamics in Guangxi, China, by time series Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat images
    Wang, Jie
    Xiao, Xiangming
    Liu, Luo
    Wu, Xiaocui
    Qin, Yuanwei
    Steiner, Jean L.
    Dong, Jinwei
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 247
  • [6] Synergetic Use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Data for Soil Moisture Mapping at Plot Scale
    Attarzadeh, Reza
    Amini, Jalal
    Notarnicola, Claudia
    Greifeneder, Felix
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [7] Monitoring Irrigation Events and Crop Dynamics Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Time Series
    Ma, Chunfeng
    Johansen, Kasper
    McCabe, Matthew F.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [8] Improving the Accuracy of Multiple Algorithms for Crop Classification by Integrating Sentinel-1 Observations with Sentinel-2 Data
    Chakhar, Amal
    Hernandez-Lopez, David
    Ballesteros, Rocio
    Moreno, Miguel A.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 21
  • [9] Synergistic Use of Radar Sentinel-1 and Optical Sentinel-2 Imagery for Crop Mapping: A Case Study for Belgium
    Van Tricht, Kristof
    Gobin, Anne
    Gilliams, Sven
    Piccard, Isabelle
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [10] Crop Water Content of Winter Wheat Revealed with Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Imagery
    Han, Dong
    Liu, Shuaibing
    Du, Ying
    Xie, Xinrui
    Fan, Lingling
    Lei, Lei
    Li, Zhenhong
    Yang, Hao
    Yang, Guijun
    [J]. SENSORS, 2019, 19 (18)