Being, time, and story. Ricoeur after and against Heidegger

被引:1
作者
Lelievre, Samuel [1 ]
机构
[1] EHESS, Paris, France
来源
ETUDES RICOEURIENNES-RICOEUR STUDIES | 2020年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
Epistemology; Heidegger; Ontology; Rationalism; Sein und Zeit; Time; Temps et recit;
D O I
10.5195/errs.2020.520
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The article draws a parallel between Ricoeur's critique of Heidegger's conception of temporality and the demand for a more general critique of Heidegger's philosophy. If Ricoeur denied a proximity between Being and Time and Time and Narrative, he placed himself within a philosophical vein that addresses Heidegger's first philosophy. But our knowledge of Heidegger's Complete Works (Gesamtausgabe), including the "Black Notebooks," requires integrating criticism of links between Heidegger and national-socialist ideology. In addition to various critical contents within Time and Narrative and developments related to the social sciences, the explicit reference to scientific concepts of time must also be highlighted. Ricoeur breaks with Heidegger's philosophy of time as inseparable from Ricoeur's reformulation of the issue of being and attempts to determine a conception of time engaging an ontological and epistemological critique of Being and Time.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / +
页数:26
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CRITIQUE, P1008
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, REV PHILOS LOUVAIN, V112, P543
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, HERMENEUTIQUES CONT, P313
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1951, ESS C, P171
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1946, QUESTIONS 3 ET 4, P69
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1985, ETRE ET TEMPS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1985, CONSTRUCTION NOTION, VIII
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Lecons pour une phenomenologie de la conscience intime du temps
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1954, REV INT PHILOS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1962, CHEMINS QUI NE MENEN