Measuring the effects of structural turnout suits on firefighter range of motion and comfort

被引:17
作者
Ciesielska-Wrobel, Izabela [1 ,2 ]
DenHartog, Emiel [1 ]
Barker, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Text, Text Protect & Comfort Ctr T PACC, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Text, Zwijnaarde, Belgium
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Range of motion; goniometer; personal protective equipment; firefighters; clothing design and testing; ENERGY-COST; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2016.1229044
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Range of motion (ROM) can be restricted by wearing stiff and bulky clothing. This is particularly true of firefighter suits that are constructed using fabric layers to provide thermal protection from fire. This study developed an evaluation technique to quantify the loss of mobility associated with wearing firefighters' protective suits that were deliberately selected to represent similar ergonomic design features. The ROM of 10 firefighters was measured using electro-goniometers attached to their bodies while they wore uniforms and a reference outfit, and performed specific movements. The most restrictive uniform is the Bulky suit that contained additional layers of materials in sleeves and on the knees. The Traditional Suit was more ROM restrictive than Ergonomic. The subjective evaluation of suits supported the objective assessments provided by the electro-goniometers. A 3-D body scanning technique was employed to establish a correlation between the bulkiness of firefighter outfits and subject ROM.Practitioner Summary: This study presents a methodology for measurements of range of motion (ROM) in firefighters wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). Even small differences in designs of PPE may impact firefighters' ROM, which can be detected by electro-goniometers providing measurements if they are attached along the joint to measure limb angular movement.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1007
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Three methods for measuring range of motion while wearing protective clothing. A comparative study [J].
Adams, Paul S. ;
Keyserling, W.Monroe .
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1993, 12 (03) :177-191
[2]  
Adams P. S., 1993, EFFECT PROTECTIVE CL
[3]   THE EFFECT OF SIZE AND FABRIC WEIGHT OF PROTECTIVE COVERALLS ON RANGE OF GROSS BODY MOTIONS [J].
ADAMS, PS ;
KEYSERLING, WM .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1995, 56 (04) :333-340
[4]  
Bhattacharya A., 2012, OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOM, DOI [10.1201/b11717, DOI 10.1201/B11717]
[5]  
Broorady L.M., 2013, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, V8, P1
[6]  
Clarkson H., 2000, MUSCULOSKELETAL ASSE
[7]   Effects of fire fighter protective ensembles on mobility and performance [J].
Coca, Aitor ;
Williams, W. Jon ;
Roberge, Raymond J. ;
Powell, Jeffrey B. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2010, 41 (04) :636-641
[8]   Effects of age and gender on maximum voluntary range of motion of the upper body joints [J].
Doriot, N ;
Wang, XG .
ERGONOMICS, 2006, 49 (03) :269-281
[9]  
Dorman L., 2007, REPORT EXAMINING IMP
[10]   The effects of protective clothing on energy consumption during different activities [J].
Dorman, Lucy E. ;
Havenith, George .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 105 (03) :463-470