Capecitabine and temozolomide combination for treatment of high-grade, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour and poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma - retrospective analysis

被引:42
作者
Rogowski, Wojciech [1 ,2 ]
Wachula, Ewa [3 ]
Gorzelak, Anita [3 ]
Lebiedzinska, Aneta [2 ,4 ]
Sulzyc-Bielicka, Violeta [5 ]
Izycka-Swieszewska, Ewa [6 ]
Zolnierek, Jakub [1 ,7 ]
Kos-Kudla, Beata [3 ]
机构
[1] Magodent Sp Zoo, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warmia & Mazury, Al Wojska Polskiego 37, PL-10228 Olsztyn, Poland
[3] Med Univ Silesia, Katowice, Poland
[4] Warmia & Mazury Oncol Ctr, Olsztyn, Poland
[5] Pomeranian Med Univ, Szczecin, Poland
[6] Med Univ Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
[7] Mem Maria Sklodowska Curie Oncol Inst, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
capecitabine; grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms; neuroendocrine carcinoma; neuroendocrine tumour; temozolomide; ENETS CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; ETOPOSIDE; G3; CANCER; CAPECITABINE/TEMOZOLOMIDE; CHEMOTHERAPY; CISPLATIN;
D O I
10.5603/EP.a2019.0010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Many retrospective studies have confirmed that capecitabine combined with temozolomide is effective in neuroendocrine neoplasms. Most of the studies focused on grade 1 and grade 2 neuroendocrine tumours, mainly of pancreatic origin. There are limited data regarding the efficacy capecitabine with temozolomide in grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours. The new World Health Organisation 2017 classification distinguished well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours from poorly differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinomas. Treatment options for grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms are limited, and the overall prognosis is better in the subgroup of patients with grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours. Material and methods: It was a retrospective study in the population of patients with diagnosed grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms of different origin treated with capecitabine and temozolomide. Data on clinical and demographic characteristics of the population were collected from four Polish clinical centres. This study aimed to evaluate response and survival parameters and compare outcomes of treatment of neuroendocrine tumours and carcinomas. Results: The study included 32 patients with grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours treated with capedtabine and temozolomide. The disease control rate was twice as high in the group of patient with neuroendocrine tumours in comparison to carcinomas (70 vs. 30%). The progression-free survival for patients with neuroendocrine tumours was 15.3 months (95% CI: 3.9-30.4), and for patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas it was 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.5 7.1). Median overall survival was 22 months (95% CI: 11.812.0) and 4.6 months (95% CI: 2.2-5.9) for patients with tumours and carcinomas, respectively. The treatment regimen was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: The combination of capedtabine and temozolomide is an effective treatment for patients with grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours with Ki-67 index ranging between 20 and 54%. The treatment did not overcome the aggressive character of neuroendocrine carcinomas and resulted in low response and survival outcomes in comparison to those achieved in tumour therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 317
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] The High-grade (WHO G3) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Category Is Morphologically and Biologically Heterogenous and Includes Both Well Differentiated and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms
    Basturk, Olca
    Yang, Zhaohai
    Tang, Laura H.
    Hruban, Ralph H.
    Adsay, Volkan
    McCall, Chad M.
    Krasinskas, Alyssa M.
    Jang, Kee-Taek
    Frankel, Wendy L.
    Balci, Serdar
    Sigel, Carlie
    Klimstra, David S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 39 (05) : 683 - 690
  • [2] Capecitabine and Temozolomide in Neuroendocrine Tumor of Unknown Primary
    Chauhan, Aman
    Farooqui, Zainab
    Murray, Le Aundra
    Weiss, Heidi L.
    Myint, Zin War
    Raajasekar, Arun Kumar A.
    Evers, B. Mark
    Arnold, Susanne
    Anthony, Lowell
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Analysis of potential response predictors to capecitabine/temozolomide in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Cives, M.
    Ghayouri, M.
    Morse, B.
    Brelsford, M.
    Black, M.
    Rizzo, A.
    Meeker, A.
    Strosberg, J.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2016, 23 (09) : 759 - 767
  • [4] Capecitabine and temozolomide in grade 1/2 neuroendocrine tumors: a Spanish multicenter experience
    Crespo, Guillermo
    Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula
    Custodio, Ana
    Lopez, Carlos
    Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto
    Alonso, Vicente
    Navarro, Miguel
    Aller, Javier
    Sevilla, Isabel
    Grande, Enrique
    Gajate, Pablo
    Alonso-Gordoa, Teresa
    Matos, Ignacio
    Capdevila, Jaume
    Nieto, Beatriz
    Barriuso, Jorge
    [J]. FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (07) : 615 - 624
  • [5] ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Gastroduodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Delle Fave, G.
    O'Toole, D.
    Sundin, A.
    Taal, B.
    Ferolla, P.
    Ramage, J. K.
    Ferone, D.
    Ito, T.
    Weber, W.
    Zheng-Pei, Z.
    De Herder, W. W.
    Pascher, A.
    Ruszniewski, P.
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 103 (02) : 119 - 124
  • [6] New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
    Eisenhauer, E. A.
    Therasse, P.
    Bogaerts, J.
    Schwartz, L. H.
    Sargent, D.
    Ford, R.
    Dancey, J.
    Arbuck, S.
    Gwyther, S.
    Mooney, M.
    Rubinstein, L.
    Shankar, L.
    Dodd, L.
    Kaplan, R.
    Lacombe, D.
    Verweij, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) : 228 - 247
  • [7] Fjällskog MLH, 2001, CANCER, V92, P1101, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1101::AID-CNCR1426>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-V
  • [9] ENETS Consensus Guidelines for High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas
    Garcia-Carbonero, R.
    Sorbye, H.
    Baudin, E.
    Raymond, E.
    Wiedenmann, B.
    Niederle, B.
    Sedlackova, E.
    Toumpanakis, C.
    Anlauf, M.
    Cwikla, J. B.
    Caplin, M.
    O'Toole, D.
    Perren, A.
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 103 (02) : 186 - 194
  • [10] Incidence, patterns of care and prognostic factors for outcome of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs): results from the National Cancer Registry of Spain (RGETNE)
    Garcia-Carbonero, R.
    Capdevila, J.
    Crespo-Herrero, G.
    Diaz-Perez, J. A.
    Martinez del Prado, M. P.
    Alonso Orduna, V.
    Sevilla-Garcia, I.
    Villabona-Artero, C.
    Beguiristain-Gomez, A.
    Llanos-Munoz, M.
    Marazuela, M.
    Alvarez-Escola, C.
    Castellano, D.
    Vilar, E.
    Jimenez-Fonseca, P.
    Teule, A.
    Sastre-Valera, J.
    Benavent-Vinuelas, M.
    Monleon, A.
    Salazar, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (09) : 1794 - 1803