Software Risk Management

被引:5
作者
Zardari, Shehnila [1 ]
机构
[1] NED Univ Engn & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & IT, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS | 2009年
关键词
Software Risk Management;
D O I
10.1109/ICIME.2009.138
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Building and maintaining software is a risky business. Since software permeates and controls so much of the present-day enterprise (and its products), delay, cost excess, and failure to fulfill a command, can have far-reaching consequences. A common response to such risk is to ignore it completely. We justify this as "positive approach," the heart and soul of a Can-Do management philosophy. But when real risks turn into real problems and throw our projects down in flames, we can see that our past "positive approach" was little more than repudiation. There should be a better way. Planning the core activities, the must-be-dones of software development, is an essential but not sufficient beginning. Given that projects never run just exactly as the optimal plan, we need Risk Management as well. Risk Management is project management for adults. It keeps your attention focused constructively on the very characteristics that, if overlooked, could lead to disastrous collapse of the project. A policy of risk aversion guides us to become more and more efficient and to avoid things that are less and less worth doing. The projects that yield real benefit are destined to be full of risk. Running away from risk will not prove to be useful instead we need to school ourselves to run toward it, but very, very cautiously. As high benefit endeavors are always risky, we have to make ways to find out the lurking risks, estimate their effect, optimize our response, and keep an eye on the changes. These are the vital skills of Risk Management.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 379
页数:5
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   A model and prototype tool to manage software risks [J].
Keshlaf, AA ;
Hashim, K .
FIRST ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON QUALITY SOFTWARE, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, :297-305
[32]   The Risks of Agile Software Development Learning from Adopters [J].
Elbanna, Amany ;
Sarker, Suprateek .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2016, 33 (05) :72-79
[33]   Uncertainties evaluation and analysis using quantitative technique for a software project [J].
Singh, Harvinder ;
Kumar, Adarsh ;
Ravulakollu, Kiran Kumar ;
Kumar, Manoj ;
Stephan, Thompson .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AD HOC AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2021, 38 (1-3) :70-81
[34]   Software Effort Interval Prediction via Bayesian Inference and Synthetic Bootstrap Resampling [J].
Song, Liyan ;
Minku, Leandro L. ;
Yao, Xin .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND METHODOLOGY, 2019, 28 (01)
[35]   An empirical approach to characterizing risky software projects based on logistic regression analysis [J].
Takagi, Y ;
Mizuno, O ;
Kikuno, T .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2005, 10 (04) :495-515
[36]   An Empirical Approach to Characterizing Risky Software Projects Based on Logistic Regression Analysis [J].
Yasunari Takagi ;
Osamu Mizuno ;
Tohru Kikuno .
Empirical Software Engineering, 2005, 10 :495-515
[37]   The institutionalization of information system project management practices [J].
Mignerat, Muriel ;
Rivard, Suzanne .
INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATION, 2012, 22 (02) :125-153
[38]   Integrating risk-based testing in industrial test processes [J].
Michael Felderer ;
Rudolf Ramler .
Software Quality Journal, 2014, 22 :543-575
[39]   Integrating risk-based testing in industrial test processes [J].
Felderer, Michael ;
Ramler, Rudolf .
SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2014, 22 (03) :543-575
[40]   A Proposed Probabilistic Model for Risk Forecasting in Small Health Informatics Projects [J].
Shahzad, Basit ;
Abdullah, Azween ;
Al-Mudimigh, Abdullah S. .
MODELING, SIMULATION AND CONTROL, 2011, 10 :194-198