Four years of early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany: a qualitative study on methodological requirements for quality of life data

被引:3
作者
Blome, Christine [1 ]
Augustin, Matthias [1 ]
Metin, Hidayet [2 ]
Lohrberg, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Hlth Serv Res Dermatol & Nursing IVDP, German Ctr Hlth Serv Res Dermatol CVderm, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Janssen Cilag GmbH, Neuss, Germany
关键词
AMNOG; Quality of life; Qualitative research; Health technology assessment; Early benefit assessment; Comparative effectiveness research; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; DECISIONS; AMNOG;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-016-0765-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since 2011, an early benefit assessment (EBA) of new drugs constricts free price setting in Germany. According to the Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act (AMNOG), pharmaceutical companies are obliged to demonstrate added benefit of new drugs over comparative treatment. Benefit is usually evaluated by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). The final appraisal is made by the Federal Joint Committee, Germany's highest-ranking decision body in the health sector, triggering drug prize negotiations between companies and statutory health insurance funds. One of four evaluation criteria is quality of life (QoL). QoL outcomes have, however, only rarely been pivotal in EBAs. This study determined methodological requirements for QoL measurement and data presentation in the EBA. In a qualitative content analysis, documents of all EBAs completed by 2014 were searched for the term QoL. Relevant passages of all EBAs of 2011-2013 were independently extracted and reduced to key content by two researchers. Recurring patterns were identified and verified through comparison with EBAs of 2014. We identified a range of requirements regarding QoL assessment, analysis, presentation, and interpretation, which go beyond official regulations. Disease-specific questionnaires are preferred and have to be validated according to certain standards and in the respective patient group. Effects must exceed the minimal important difference, which in turn must be validated in compliance with specific requirements. Often, instruments were not accepted as QoL measures, sometimes inconsistently across EBAs. Another frequent reason for non-acceptance of QoL data was that more than 30 % of randomized patients could not be analyzed due to missing data. Non-compliance with methodological requirements for QoL evidence impairs chances for positive benefit evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 193
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   The Use of Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Within Comparative Effectiveness Research Implications for Clinical Practice and Health Care Policy [J].
Ahmed, Sara ;
Berzon, Richard A. ;
Revicki, Dennis A. ;
Lenderking, William R. ;
Moinpour, Carol M. ;
Basch, Ethan ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Wu, Albert W. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (12) :1060-1070
[3]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument [J].
Brady, MJ ;
Cella, DF ;
Mo, F ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Tulsky, DS ;
Lloyd, SR ;
Deasy, S ;
Cobleigh, M ;
Shiomoto, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) :974-986
[4]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[5]   Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy prostate instrument [J].
Esper, P ;
Mo, F ;
Chodak, G ;
Sinner, M ;
Cella, D ;
Pienta, KJ .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :920-928
[6]   Early Benefit Assessment of Pharmaceuticals in Germany: Manufacturers' Expectations versus the Federal Joint Committee's Decisions [J].
Fischer, Katharina E. ;
Stargardt, Tom .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (08) :1030-1047
[7]   SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FIVE EUROPEAN DRUG REIMBURSEMENT SYSTEMS [J].
Franken, Margreet ;
le Polain, Maite ;
Cleemput, Irina ;
Koopmanschap, Marc .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (04) :349-357
[8]   Structural changes in the German pharmaceutical market: Price setting mechanisms based on the early benefit evaluation [J].
Henschke, Cornelia ;
Sundmacher, Leonie ;
Busse, Reinhard .
HEALTH POLICY, 2013, 109 (03) :263-269
[9]   Early benefit assessment of new drugs in Germany - Results from 2011 to 2012 [J].
Hoern, Helmut ;
Nink, Katrin ;
McGauran, Natalie ;
Wieseler, Beate .
HEALTH POLICY, 2014, 116 (2-3) :147-153
[10]  
Klose K., 2013, PUBLIC HLTH FORUM, V21