Comparison of the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective action shown during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces

被引:120
作者
Riemann, BL
Myers, JB
Lephart, SM
机构
[1] Georgia So Univ, Dept Hlth & Kinesiol, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2003年 / 84卷 / 01期
关键词
biomechanics; equilibrium; kinematics; posture; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2003.50004
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the quantity of ankle, knee, hip, and trunk corrective actions shown during single-leg stance. Design: Counter-balanced crossover design. Single-leg stance under the conditions of eyes open on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces and eyes closed on a firm surface were recorded for 12 seconds in 18 participants. Setting: A university neuromuscular research laboratory. Participants: Eight en healthy and recreationally active college students. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Average angular displacement magnitude between successive sampling instances for the ankle, knee, hip, and trunk. Results: A significant condition by joint interaction was revealed. Post hoe comparisons revealed that the ankle dominated as the source of corrective action across each of the testing conditions, As the challenge became greater because of foam surface or eyes closed. more corrective action occurred at proximal joints (hip and/or knee). Conclusions: The ankle is of primary importance during single-leg stance on firm, foam, and multiaxial surfaces, with proximal joints having an increased role under more challenging conditions. These results provide a scientific basis for clinicians' and researchers' decisions about support surface and visual condition during single-leg postural control testing and training.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 95
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF VISUAL AND SUPPORT SURFACE ORIENTATION REFERENCES UPON POSTURAL CONTROL IN VESTIBULAR DEFICIENT SUBJECTS [J].
BLACK, FO ;
WALL, C ;
NASHNER, LM .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1983, 95 (3-4) :199-210
[2]   EFFECT OF VISION AND STANCE WIDTH ON HUMAN-BODY MOTION WHEN STANDING - IMPLICATIONS FOR AFFERENT CONTROL OF LATERAL SWAY [J].
DAY, BL ;
STEIGER, MJ ;
THOMPSON, PD ;
MARSDEN, CD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 469 :479-499
[3]  
Diener HC., 1988, PROG BRAIN RES, V76, P253
[4]  
DIETZ V, 1980, EXP BRAIN RES, V40, P89
[5]  
DIETZ V, 1982, EXP BRAIN RES, V47, P172
[6]  
DORNAN J, 1978, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V59, P586
[7]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF POSTURAL ADJUSTMENTS IN 2 METHODS OF BALANCE TESTING [J].
DUNCAN, PW ;
STUDENSKI, S ;
CHANDLER, J ;
BLOOMFELD, R ;
LAPOINTE, LK .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1990, 70 (02) :88-96
[8]  
EKDAHL C, 1989, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V21, P187
[9]  
ENBOM H, 1988, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, P58
[10]   POSTURAL SWAY DURING STANDING AND UNEXPECTED DISTURBANCE OF BALANCE IN RANDOM SAMPLES OF MEN OF DIFFERENT AGES [J].
ERA, P ;
HEIKKINEN, E .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1985, 40 (03) :287-295