Seismic Velocity Estimation Using Passive Downhole Distributed Acoustic Sensing Records: Examples From the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth

被引:59
作者
Lellouch, A. [1 ]
Yuan, S. [1 ]
Spica, Z. [1 ,2 ]
Biondi, B. [1 ]
Ellsworth, W. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Geophys, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Tokyo, Earthquake Res Inst, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Seismic velocity; Distributed Acoustic Sensing; borehole seismology; SAFOD; Downhole; NOISE DATA; WAVE;
D O I
10.1029/2019JB017533
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Structural imaging and event location require an accurate estimation of the seismic velocity. However, active seismic surveys used to estimate it are expensive and time-consuming. During the last decade, fiber-optic-based distributed acoustic sensing has emerged as a reliable, enduring, and high-resolution seismic sensing technology. We show how downhole distributed acoustic sensing passive records from the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth can be used for seismic velocity estimation. Using data recorded from earthquakes propagating near-vertically, we compute seismic velocities using first-break picking as well as slant stack decomposition. This methodology allows for the estimation of both P and S wave velocity models. We also use records of the ambient seismic field for interferometry and P wave velocity model extraction. Results are compared to a regional model obtained from surface seismic as well as a conventional downhole geophone survey. We find that using recorded earthquakes, we obtain the highest P wave model resolution. In addition, it is the only method that allows for S wave velocity estimation. Computed P and S models unravel three distinct areas at the depth range of 50-750 m, which were not present in the regional model. In addition, we find high V-P/V-S values near the surface and a possible V-P/V-S anomaly about 500 m deep. We confirm its existence by observing a strong S-P mode conversion at that depth.
引用
收藏
页码:6931 / 6948
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Ajo-Franklin J., 2017, Expanded Abstracts of the 87th SEG Ann. Internat. Mtg, P5223, DOI DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2017-17774027.1
[2]   Removal of overburden velocity anomaly effects for depth conversion [J].
Armstrong, T ;
McAteer, J ;
Connolly, P .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2001, 49 (01) :79-99
[3]  
Bakulin Andrey, 2017, Leading Edge, V36, P1001, DOI 10.1190/tle36121001.1
[4]   The virtual source method: Theory and case study [J].
Bakulin, Andrey ;
Calvert, Rodney .
GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (04) :SI139-SI150
[5]   Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements [J].
Bensen, G. D. ;
Ritzwoller, M. H. ;
Barmin, M. P. ;
Levshin, A. L. ;
Lin, F. ;
Moschetti, M. P. ;
Shapiro, N. M. ;
Yang, Y. .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 169 (03) :1239-1260
[6]   VELOCITY ESTIMATION BY BEAM STACK [J].
BIONDI, B .
GEOPHYSICS, 1992, 57 (08) :1034-1047
[7]  
Biondi B., 2017, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, V2017, P2752, DOI DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2017-17745041.1
[8]   HIGH-RESOLUTION VELOCITY SPECTRA USING EIGENSTRUCTURE METHODS [J].
BIONDI, BL ;
KOSTOV, C .
GEOPHYSICS, 1989, 54 (07) :832-842
[9]   Structure of the California Coast Ranges and San Andreas Fault at SAFOD from seismic waveform inversion and reflection imaging [J].
Bleibinhaus, Florian ;
Hole, John A. ;
Ryberg, Trond ;
Fuis, Gary S. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2007, 112 (B6)
[10]   Stacking velocities in the presence of overburden velocity anomalies [J].
Blias, Emil .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2009, 57 (03) :323-341