Offense-defense confrontation decision making for dynamic UAV swarm versus UAV swarm

被引:48
作者
Xing, Dongjing [1 ]
Zhen, Ziyang [1 ]
Gong, Huajun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Automat Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Unmanned aerial vehicles; swarm versus swarm UAV combat; offense-defense confrontation; target allocation decision; swarm motion decision;
D O I
10.1177/0954410019853982
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper studies a dynamic swarm versus swarm unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) combat problem and proposes a self-organized offense-defense confrontation decision-making (ODCDM) algorithm. This ODCDM algorithm adopts the distributed architecture to account for real-time implementation, where each UAV is treated as an agent and able to solve its local decision problem through the information exchange with neighbors. At each decision making step, the swarm seeks an optimal target allocation scheme and each UAV further selects the corresponding behavioral rules, leading to emergent offensive and defensive behaviors. Therefore, the offense-defense confrontation decision-making process is divided into the target allocation decision based on distributed consensus-based auction algorithm (CBAA) and social-force-based swarm motion decision. An offense-defense preference is introduced to the target allocation optimization model, providing the tactics options for UAV to adopt more offensive or more defensive posture. On the basis of classic collective behaviors of cohesion, separation and alignment, a combat stimulus is considered to drive UAV towards the assigned target. Finally, simulation experiments are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the ODCDM algorithm, and analyze the influences of the external deployment and internal tactics on the combat results.
引用
收藏
页码:5689 / 5702
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Swarm coordination of mini-UAVs for target search using imperfect sensors [J].
Alfeo, Antonio L. ;
Cimino, Mario G. C. A. ;
De Francesco, Nicoletta ;
Lazzeri, Alessandro ;
Lega, Massimiliano ;
Vaglini, Gigliola .
INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2018, 12 (02) :149-162
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, P AIAA INF AER C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ENCY AEROSPACE ENG
[4]   Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study [J].
Ballerini, M. ;
Calbibbo, N. ;
Candeleir, R. ;
Cavagna, A. ;
Cisbani, E. ;
Giardina, I. ;
Lecomte, V. ;
Orlandi, A. ;
Parisi, G. ;
Procaccini, A. ;
Viale, M. ;
Zdravkovic, V. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (04) :1232-1237
[5]   The Small and Silent Force Multiplier: A Swarm UAV-Electronic Attack [J].
Cevik, Polat ;
Kocaman, Ibrahim ;
Akgul, Abdullah S. ;
Akca, Barbaros .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2013, 70 (1-4) :595-608
[6]   Consensus-Based Decentralized Auctions for Robust Task Allocation [J].
Choi, Han-Lim ;
Brunet, Luc ;
How, Jonathan P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, 2009, 25 (04) :912-926
[7]  
Clough B.T, 2002, UAV SWARMING SO WHAT
[8]   Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups [J].
Couzin, ID ;
Krause, J ;
James, R ;
Ruxton, GD ;
Franks, NR .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 218 (01) :1-11
[9]  
Day M. A., 2012, THESIS NAVAL POSTGRA
[10]  
Fan DD, 2017, P GEN EV COMP C COMP, P15