Removal of precursors for disinfection by-products (DBPs) - differences between ozone- and OH-radical-induced oxidation

被引:134
作者
Kleiser, G [1 ]
Frimmel, FH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Karlsruhe, Engler Bunte Inst, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
DBP; THM; AOX; ozone; water treatment; hydrogen peroxide; UV;
D O I
10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00377-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pre-oxidation is often applied to reduce the formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs). The aim of preoxidation is to remove the centers of natural organic matter (NOM) which are responsible for the formation of DBPs. In this paper, the differences between ozone- and OH-radical-induced oxidation to remove DBP-precursors are compared. The experiments were done with water of the River Ruhr (Germany) with a concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) of 2 mg/l. Ozonation was able to remove DBP precursors selectively. After application of an absorbed ozone mass of 1.5 mg/mg DOG, a reduction in the formation potential for (THM-FP) and in the formation potential for organic halogen adsorbable on activated carbon (AOX-FP) down to 68 and 73% of the initial concentration was achieved, respectively. A removal of NOM was not achieved using absorbed ozone masses between 0.5 and 1.5 mg/mg DOG. In the hydrogen peroxide/UV process, in which OH-radicals are the reactive species, an increase in the THM concentration was measured after application of this process with short irradiation times. The maximum value of the THM-FP was 20% higher than the initial THM-FP. After an irradiation time of 1050 min and a hydrogen peroxide consumption of 5.6 mg/l, the THM-FP and AOX-FP decreased to 75 and 71% of the initial formation potential, respectively. There was no selective removal of DBP precursors because the DOC concentration decreased also to 75% of the initial DOC-concentration after 1050 min of irradiation. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ABBTBRAUN G, 1993, PRAKTISCHE ASPEKTE H
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Angew. Chem, DOI [10.1002/ange.19750872104, DOI 10.1002/ANGE.19750872104]
[3]  
FERGUSON DW, 1990, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V82, P181
[4]  
Frimmel F. H., 1988, HUMIC SUBSTANCES THE
[5]  
FRIMMEL FH, 1999, IN PRESS TECHNOLOGY
[6]  
GILBERT E, 1980, CHEM OXIDATION DVGW, P206
[7]  
HOIGNE J, 1998, HDB ENV CHEM C
[8]   IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION OF THE AMES MUTAGENIC COMPOUND 3-CHLORO-4-(DICHLOROMETHYL)-5-HYDROXY-2(5H)-FURANONE AND OF ITS GEOMETRIC ISOMER (E)-2-CHLORO-3-(DICHLOROMETHYL)-4-OXOBUTENOIC ACID IN CHLORINE-TREATED HUMIC WATER AND DRINKING-WATER EXTRACTS [J].
KRONBERG, L ;
HOLMBOM, B ;
REUNANEN, M ;
TIKKANEN, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 22 (09) :1097-1103
[9]  
KUHN W, 1974, THESIS KARLSRUHE
[10]   PHOTOCHEMICAL PROCESSES FOR WATER-TREATMENT [J].
LEGRINI, O ;
OLIVEROS, E ;
BRAUN, AM .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1993, 93 (02) :671-698