Impact of Dexmedetomidine on Analgesic Requirements in Patients After Cardiac Surgery in a Fast-Track Recovery Room Setting

被引:40
作者
Barletta, Jeffrey E. [1 ]
Miedema, Sherri L. [1 ]
Wiseman, Douglas [2 ]
Heiser, John C. [3 ]
McAllen, Karen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Spectrum Hlth, Dept Pharm, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[2] Spectrum Hlth, Dept Anesthesia, Grand Rapids, MI 49503 USA
[3] W Michigan Cardiothorac Surg PLC, Grand Rapids, MI USA
来源
PHARMACOTHERAPY | 2009年 / 29卷 / 12期
关键词
dexmedetomidine; propofol; sedation; cardiothoracic surgery; ARTERY-BYPASS GRAFT; EXTUBATION; SEDATION; PROPOFOL; OUTCOMES; UNIT;
D O I
10.1592/phco.29.12.1427
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Study Objective. To compare postoperative opioid requirements in patients who received dexmedetomidine versus propofol after cardiac surgery. Design. Retrospective cohort study. Setting. Large, community teaching hospital that uses a fast-track cardiovascular recovery unit (CVRU) model. Patients. One hundred adults who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and/or valvular surgery, and who received either dexmedetomidine (50 patients) or propofol (50 patients) for perioperative sedation. Measurements and Main Results. Patients were matched according to surgery type and left ventricular ejection fraction. Opioid requirements were assessed over two time intervals: from arrival in the CVRU to discontinuation of the sedative infusion, and from CVRU arrival to CVRU discharge, up to a maximum of 72 hours if admission to the intensive care unit was necessary. All postoperative opioid doses were converted to morphine equivalents. Length of mechanical ventilation, quality of sedation, adverse drug events, and sedation-related costs were determined. Opioid requirements were significantly lower during the sedative infusion period for dexmedetomidine-treated patients than for propofol-treated patients (median [range] 0 [0-10 mg] vs 4 mg [0-33 mg], p<0.001), but not through the entire CVRU admission (median [range] 26 mg [0-119 mg] vs 30 mg (0-100 mg], p=0.284). The proportion of patients who did not require opioids during the infusion was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the propofol group (32 [64%] vs 13 [26%], p<0.001). No significant differences were noted between the groups for length of mechanical ventilation, quality of sedation, or adverse events. Sedation-related costs were significantly higher (similar to$50/patient higher) with dexmedetomidine (p<0.001). Conclusion. Dexmedetomidine resulted in lower opioid requirements in patients after cardiac surgery versus those receiving propofol, but this did not result in shorter durations of mechanical ventilation, using a fast-track CVRU model.
引用
收藏
页码:1427 / 1432
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] American Pain Society, 2003, PRINC AN US TREATM A
  • [2] AROM KV, 1995, ANN THORAC SURG, V60, P127
  • [3] Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Cheng, DCH
    Karski, J
    Peniston, C
    Asokumar, B
    Raveendran, G
    Carroll, J
    Nierenberg, H
    Roger, S
    Mickle, D
    Tong, J
    Zelovitsky, J
    David, T
    Sandler, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 112 (03) : 755 - 764
  • [4] Fast-track failure after cardiac surgery: Development of a prediction model
    Constantinides, Vasilis A.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    Fazil, Azeern
    Kaur, Kelly
    Leonard, Richard
    Platt, Mike
    Casula, Roberto
    Stanbridge, Rex
    Darzi, Ara
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (12) : 2877 - 2884
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine does not improve patient satisfaction when compared with propofol during mechanical ventilation
    Corbett, SM
    Rebuck, JA
    Greene, CM
    Callas, PW
    Neale, BW
    Healey, MA
    Leavitt, BJ
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (05) : 940 - 945
  • [6] Addition of dexmedetomidine to standard sedation regimens after cardiac surgery: An outcomes analysis
    Dasta, Joseph F.
    Jacobi, Judith
    Sesti, Anne-Marie
    McLaughlin, Trent P.
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2006, 26 (06): : 798 - 805
  • [7] Dexmedetomidine: An updated review
    Gerlach, Anthony T.
    Dasta, Joseph F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2007, 41 (02) : 245 - 254
  • [8] ICU sedation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Dexmedetomidine-based versus propofol-based sedation regimens
    Herr, DL
    Sum-Ping, STJ
    England, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2003, 17 (05) : 576 - 584
  • [9] Martin Eike, 2003, J Intensive Care Med, V18, P29, DOI 10.1177/0885066602239122
  • [10] Safety and efficacy of fast track in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery
    Moon, MC
    Abdoh, A
    Hamilton, GA
    Lindsay, WG
    Duke, PC
    Pascoe, EA
    Del Rizzo, DF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2001, 16 (04) : 319 - 326