Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy

被引:197
作者
Panteris, V. [1 ]
Haringsma, J. [1 ]
Kuipers, E. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATION; HOT BIOPSY FORCEPS; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; LARGE SESSILE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PIECEMEAL RESECTION; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; COLON;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1215179
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aim: Perforation of the colon as a result of endoscopic manipulation is considered a severe adverse event. The goal of this review is to present the expected incidence of perforation in relation to varying levels of difficulty in endoscopic exploration and polypectomy together with the whole context of mechanisms, predisposing factors, diagnosis, and the strategic management plan. Methods: An extensive search was undertaken in the Medline database for recent articles (published from 2000 onwards) in the English language using specific terms relating to the reported frequency of perforation during diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in various medical settings and including morbidity, mortality, and appropriate management. Additional articles were retrieved irrespective of publication date to supplement where necessary data on important issues such as mechanisms of perforation, risk factors, diagnosis, and prevention. Results: The frequency of perforation was found to be 1 in 1400 for overall colonoscopies and I in 1000 for therapeutic colonoscopies. Varying perforation rates have been estimated for polypectomies, endoscopic mucosal resections, and endoscopic submucosal dissections. The mortality has dropped to 0% in most studies, with the highest reported percentage being 0.02%. Advanced age, female sex, the presence of multiple co-morbidities, diverticulosis, and bowel obstruction have been shown to increase the risk of perforation. The decision between surgery and nonoperative treatment will depend on the type of injury, the quality of bowel preparation, the underlying colonic pathology, and the clinical stability of the patient. Conclusion: The perforation rate has declined in recent years in relation to more historical series, but there is now an increasing trend as a consequence of advanced interventional endoscopy. Awareness and experience are the only preventive measures that can limit the incidence of perforation.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 951
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[61]   Quality indicators for colonoscopy [J].
Rex, DK ;
Petrini, JL ;
Baron, TH ;
Chak, A ;
Cohen, J ;
Deal, SE ;
Hoffman, B ;
Jacobson, BC ;
Mergener, K ;
Petersen, BT ;
Safdi, MA ;
Faigel, DO ;
Pike, IM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :S16-S28
[62]   Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer [J].
Rex, DK ;
Bond, JH ;
Winawer, S ;
Levin, TR ;
Burt, RW ;
Johnson, DA ;
Kirk, LM ;
Litlin, S ;
Lieberman, DA ;
Waye, JD ;
Church, J ;
Marshall, JB ;
Riddell, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (06) :1296-1308
[63]   Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video) [J].
Saito, Yutaka ;
Uraoka, Toshio ;
Matsuda, Takahisa ;
Emura, Fabian ;
Ikehara, Hisatomo ;
Mashimo, Yumi ;
Kikuchi, Tsuyoshi ;
Fu, Kuang-I ;
Sano, Yasushi ;
Saito, Daizo .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (05) :966-973
[64]   Circumferential EMR of carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus: case report [J].
Satodate, H ;
Inoue, H ;
Yoshida, T ;
Usui, S ;
Iwashita, M ;
Fukami, N ;
Shiokawa, A ;
Kudo, S .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (02) :288-292
[65]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-STUDY OF INJURY IN THE CANINE RIGHT COLON FROM SIMULTANEOUS BIOPSY AND COAGULATION WITH DIFFERENT HOT BIOPSY FORCEPS [J].
SAVIDES, TJ ;
SEE, JA ;
JENSEN, DM ;
JUTABHA, R ;
MACHICADO, GA ;
HIRABAYASHI, K .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 42 (06) :573-578
[66]   Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists [J].
Sieg, A ;
Hachmoeller-Eisenbach, U ;
Eisenbach, T .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (06) :620-627
[67]   A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists [J].
Singh, N ;
Harrison, M ;
Rex, DK .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (03) :414-418
[68]   Endoscopic mucosal resection for colonic non-polypoid neoplasms [J].
Su, MY ;
Hsu, CM ;
Ho, YP ;
Lien, JM ;
Lin, CJ ;
Chiu, CT ;
Chen, PC ;
Tung, SY ;
Wu, CS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (10) :2174-2179
[69]   Iatrogenic perforation at therapeutic colonoscopy: Should the endoscopist attempt closure using endoclips or transfer immediately to surgery? [J].
Taku, K ;
Sano, Y ;
Fu, KI ;
Saito, Y .
ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (04) :428-428
[70]   Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors [J].
Tamegai, Y. ;
Saito, Y. ;
Masaki, N. ;
Hinohara, C. ;
Oshima, T. ;
Kogure, E. ;
Liu, Y. ;
Uemura, N. ;
Saito, K. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (05) :418-422