Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy

被引:197
作者
Panteris, V. [1 ]
Haringsma, J. [1 ]
Kuipers, E. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; ARGON PLASMA COAGULATION; HOT BIOPSY FORCEPS; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; LARGE SESSILE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PIECEMEAL RESECTION; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; COLON;
D O I
10.1055/s-0029-1215179
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aim: Perforation of the colon as a result of endoscopic manipulation is considered a severe adverse event. The goal of this review is to present the expected incidence of perforation in relation to varying levels of difficulty in endoscopic exploration and polypectomy together with the whole context of mechanisms, predisposing factors, diagnosis, and the strategic management plan. Methods: An extensive search was undertaken in the Medline database for recent articles (published from 2000 onwards) in the English language using specific terms relating to the reported frequency of perforation during diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in various medical settings and including morbidity, mortality, and appropriate management. Additional articles were retrieved irrespective of publication date to supplement where necessary data on important issues such as mechanisms of perforation, risk factors, diagnosis, and prevention. Results: The frequency of perforation was found to be 1 in 1400 for overall colonoscopies and I in 1000 for therapeutic colonoscopies. Varying perforation rates have been estimated for polypectomies, endoscopic mucosal resections, and endoscopic submucosal dissections. The mortality has dropped to 0% in most studies, with the highest reported percentage being 0.02%. Advanced age, female sex, the presence of multiple co-morbidities, diverticulosis, and bowel obstruction have been shown to increase the risk of perforation. The decision between surgery and nonoperative treatment will depend on the type of injury, the quality of bowel preparation, the underlying colonic pathology, and the clinical stability of the patient. Conclusion: The perforation rate has declined in recent years in relation to more historical series, but there is now an increasing trend as a consequence of advanced interventional endoscopy. Awareness and experience are the only preventive measures that can limit the incidence of perforation.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 951
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases
    Ahmad, NA
    Kochman, ML
    Long, WB
    Furth, EE
    Ginsberg, GG
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) : 390 - 396
  • [2] Endoscopic perforation of the colon: Lessons from a 10-year study
    Anderson, ML
    Pasha, TM
    Leighton, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (12) : 3418 - 3422
  • [3] Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps
    Arebi, Naila
    Swain, David
    Suzuki, Noriko
    Fraser, Chris
    Price, Ashley
    Saunders, Brian P.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 42 (07) : 859 - 866
  • [4] Bowel explosion with colonic perforation during argon plasma coagulation for hemorrhagic radiation-induced proctitis
    Ben Soussan, E
    Mathieu, N
    Roque, I
    Antonietti, M
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (03) : 412 - 413
  • [5] Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma
    Bergmann, U
    Beger, HG
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (03): : 475 - 479
  • [6] Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma
    Bories, E
    Pesenti, C
    Monges, G
    Lelong, B
    Moutardier, V
    Delpero, JR
    Giovannini, M
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [7] Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations
    Brooker, JC
    Saunders, BP
    Shah, SG
    Thapar, CJ
    Suzuki, N
    Williams, CB
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 55 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [8] Polypectomy devices
    Carpenter, Steven
    Petersen, Bret T.
    Chuttani, Ram
    Croffie, Joseph
    DiSario, James
    Liu, Julia
    Mishkin, Daniel
    Shah, Raj
    Somogyi, Lehel
    Tierney, William
    Song, Louis Michelle Wong Kee
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (06) : 741 - 749
  • [9] A comparison of depth of tissue injury caused by different modes of electrosurgical current in a pig colon model
    Chino, A
    Karasawa, T
    Uragami, N
    Endo, Y
    Takahashi, H
    Fujita, R
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (03) : 374 - 379
  • [10] MINI-PERFORATION OF THE COLON - NOT ALL POSTPOLYPECTOMY PERFORATIONS REQUIRE LAPAROTOMY
    CHRISTIE, JP
    MARRAZZO, J
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1991, 34 (02) : 132 - 135